Today I read @paulmromer thread - particularly the part about schools (I recommend it!).

And we need to talk about #SchoolReopening, from a scientific perspective.

So here goes, with thanks to @sarita @ambilinski @RobinCogan @abuttenheim & others: https://twitter.com/paulmromer/status/1279070990954311685
2) We HAVE seen outbreaks in some schools in some countries that have re-opened.

BUT that may be due to *staff* transmission, or due to general re-opening of the economy and normal community transmission. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article243670537.html
3) Ideally, we'd keep sick kids & teachers home. (But symptom-checkers aren't perfect.)

Ideally, we'd test everyone weekly to catch asymptomatic infections. (But there aren't enough tests.)

Ideally, we'd trust people to self-isolate if they've been exposed. (hah.)
I think it's a great idea, but the jury's still out on its efficacy.

And at the end of the day, we need more testing.
3) Additionally, we're weighing the very low risk of serious #COVID19 consequences in kids, vs very real negative educational & social effects of "no school", vs the large risk of severe infection for older teachers, vs a huge negative effect of school closure on working parents.
This is a moral judgment. Some may say "I will tolerate no risk." In which case, we should shut down schools.

Some may say, "Our economy cannot work without school." In which case, we should reopen and accept the risk.

How to assign value to one scenario vs another? #bioethics
(NB: This is why @AmerAcadPeds came in strongly on the side of re-opening -- they feel that the risk of infection & transmission among kids is far lower than the risk of impaired education, food, safety, & social-emotional development. Full recs here:
https://services.aap.org/en/pages/2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-infections/clinical-guidance/covid-19-planning-considerations-return-to-in-person-education-in-schools/ )
5) All that said (I'm running out of space here): In the absence of clear answers or definitive science, though, we MUST MAKE CHOICES. Because September is coming, whether we want it to or not.
And, as a working parent myself, let me be transparent: I desperately want my kids to go back to school.
So, I will try to addend more references later in the day, but based on reviewing the literature gathered by many, many people, if we are going to TRY to go back to school, here is what we MUST do:
8) Third, we should all work to #GetMePPE for *teachers*, who are most at risk and seem to be most likely to spread the virus.

Face shields for teachers while teaching may also be an option - so kids can see their teachers' faces

And kids should #MaskUp when/where possible.
Teachers should have safe spaces where they can take their masks off and eat/drink, while maintaining physical distance

Kids should most likely eat in their classroom, rather than in cafeterias
9) Fourth, we should be planning now for likely distance learning once respiratory virus season hits. Everyone will be symptomatic, all the time.

(In an ideal world, kids get a couple months of in-person & teachers get time to plan engaging & accessible online learning.)
10) Lastly, we NEED TO HAVE FUNDING. This is looking at you @BetsyDeVosED --> the schools can't do this without $.

It costs $$$$ to test, to hire teachers, to create small classrooms.

***I can't emphasize this enough. Without money, the schools will stay closed.***
I've run out of threads on this tweet...there's SO MUCH more to say. But this is a start.

At the end of the day: We must keep our kids' interests first, & invest in their safety. I hope we get definitive studies on safe reopening. In the meantime, we'll muddle through together.
You can follow @meganranney.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: