Read on Twitter
i dont think ppl understand the intention of that system. idk about y'all but i'd rather tolerate someone who isn't as good but is kind and have perseverance rather than someone who's characters dont match with me at all. i know its a survival show, and im not saying that there
are bad apples in the bunch. but a group couldn't just function well by having the best performers. they need to match well and able to tolerate e/o. the process is kinda natural if you dont see the scores tbh. put 23 ppl together and ask them to compete. first they'll pick the
most talented, later they'll pick ppl who fit the group dynamic more. the top 3 would probably be those who perform the best but others would vary. automatically the bunch that are meant to be together would stick together. they'll know which one of them needs to practice the
most but they wouldn't wanna do it without him. thats a good team :))
putting all top tier members purposely into a group without considering if they match well would result in unhealthy internal rivalry, which is the biggest problem for a group. you want ppl to balance you out so everyone has a role and could contribute in various areas. they're
not just performers, they're human beings. even if you say that you cant see this/ that member do much on stage, thats just your opinion. you dont know how they all live together behind the scenes. those ppl might just be the ones holding the group morals.
