We don't know who needs to hear this but title of a study is not the evidence in itself.
We don't know who needs to hear this but a study merely mentioned in nlm.nih website is not the evidence for anything.
It is important to read studies beyond their headlines/title. The reading involves a process called critical appraisal. You should know what you are looking for when reading a study. Just reading the 'Conclusion' is not enough.
Here's a starter pack by @LogicofScience:
10 steps for evaluating scientific papers https://thelogicofscience.com/2015/08/03/10-steps-for-evaluating-scientific-papers/
10 steps for evaluating scientific papers https://thelogicofscience.com/2015/08/03/10-steps-for-evaluating-scientific-papers/
We will enumerate some of the important things to look out for when appraising a study in another thread soon.
Will conclude this thread with a thoughtful quote by Robert M Pirsig
Will conclude this thread with a thoughtful quote by Robert M Pirsig