Thread refuting the nonsense thread by iskcon who do not know an inch of shree krishna.
Mark my words If today krishna comes anyhow , iskcon and similar andhbhakt has to face his Sudarshan Chakra. Read my thread why ? I will refute this nonsense thread. https://twitter.com/RadharamnDas/status/1277822542313644033

First of all there is no any evidence in mahabharat about radha ? Then how can these people forcefully join the character of radha with Yogiraj Bhagvan Shrikrishna ? This radharani is completely fictional character like superman , Batman.

There are real scholar who understand true krishna as per mahabharat and they presented the real version of shree krishna as per mahabharata are:
1.Rishi Dayanand
2.Lala Lajpat Rai
3.Bankim Chandra Chatarji
4.Pundit Chaupat
5. Pro.Bhavanilal Bhartiy

Apart from rishi all 4 have presented their researched biography shrikrishna as per mahabharat. While rishi was the 1st person to attack on very root cause behing all such wrong allegations on shree krishna. The reason is Puaranas. Which contains many offensive thing on krishna.

The thread by Radharam Das ji based on only one point.
Krishna was the supreme god hence everything belongs to him as well as he has super power to expand himself to make his 1000 copies etc.
Apart from this some random so called pseudologic.

First I will refute some of his claim the.n I will present some points from mahabharata.
First of all present mahabharat is corrupted one which contains 1000s of adulteration hence the GEETA is also adulterated. We do not have pure geeta.

Now theory of incarnation og god has no foundation from Vedas. On contrary Vedas clearly states that god cannot be restricted into veins and nerves. Yaju. 40.8 clearly deny it. स पर्यगाच्छुक्रमकायमव्रणमस्नाविर....
3 properties , अकायम , अव्रणम , अस्नाविरम

Means
Akaayam- devoid of both subtle and macro body
Avranam- cannot be penetrated into , devoid of structure , devoid of void
Asnaviram- devoid of veins and nerves
This means god cannot take incarnation , he cannot be bounded into the system of nerves and veins.

Second radharam ji states some points about radha , about which I mentioned the character radha is completely imaginary like superman in comics , only purana support it while mahabharat reject it.

As per shastras , Vedas are above all , Vedas are Param Praman , ultimate proof. Hence Shree krishna was not a supreme god But a supreme Human like shreerama ever born on earth.
The supernatural powers of expanding krishna into 1000 of copies has no meaning are also like comics

As per Mahabharat krishna had only 1 wife , Rukmini. The 16108 wife concept is not based on mahabharat. To understand krishna mahabharat is ultimate base.
Bankim,lala ji, chamupati like scholars reject these allegations.

Bhagvan shreekrishna says in gita , one has to control his mind and should not please his indriy , and focus mind towards ultimate goals , and as per mahabharat krishna practiced unbroken celibacy until he was 48. After that pradyumn was born.

Now how krishna can do all these wrong activity while he himself prohibits all of these ? I will prove the real character of krishna from mahabharat which contradicts the allegations like Chor and Ranchhod.

In mahabharat when krishna save parikshit and give him a new life he says , I have never lied even while playing in childhood , I have never ran from battleground.
This means he never lied in his life nor ran away from battle , how can we say him chor and ranchhod ?

Shisupal make many allegation on krishna due to which he face his Sudarshan chakra , but today we are making 100 times offensive allegation than shishupal ,what should be our fate then ?Either we make offensive allegation or justifies these with pseudologic , we deserve same fate

The allegations on krishna has no any solid base , the root cause behind all allegation are Bhagavat puran and some other puranas.
I want to ask Radharam ji , there are some shlok which clearly talks about sexual activities like porn , can you also justify them ?

Instead of justify fake allegation we need to wash out the root cause , we need to put our stand that Purana are not authentic , only mahabharata is authentic to understand shree krishna. The wrong shlokas in purana must be washed out. If you cannot do that don't preach gita.

The true arjun will follow true gita of krishna , and stand against the root cause of these allegation , people who justify such allegation are also equal to those who mock krishna.

We don't need to worship imaginory Bal Rup of krishna , we need to worship the real Yuva Rup of krishna , which gita talks about.
I'd iskcon continue to justify these allegations , I hope anyhow krishna should come and let andhbhakt face the sudarshan chakra.

@AchAnkurArya @SanjeevSanskrit @arjit2000 @aryasamajhyd