Comparison of Sachin& #39;s 17 SENA Test 100s vs Virat& #39;s 11 SENA Test 100s :-

Sachin& #39;s avg in those matches - 208.5
Average of all other batsmen - 35.77

Ratio = 208.5/35.77 = 5.83

Virat& #39;s avg in those matches - 144.0
Average of other batsmen - 32.7

Ratio = 144.0/32.7 = 4.40

1/n

Comparing Sachin& #39;s & Virat& #39;s ratio :-
5.83>>>4.40

Ratio of ratios = 5.83/4.40 = 1.33

Conclusion :-

Sachin& #39;s centuries in SENA had 33% more impact than Virat& #39;s centuries in SENA, very big difference.

Some important points in next part :-

#Cricket
2/n

1. Sachin played with batting stalwarts like Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag, Ganguly hence reducing his ratio which could have been even higher.

2. There is no legend level batsman in Virat& #39;s team which boosted his ratio.

#Cricket
3/n

3. India currently has best bowling attack reducing other batsmen average hence increasing Virat& #39;s ratio.

4. India& #39;s earlier bowling attack struggled overseas increasing other batsmen average hence reducing Sachin& #39;s ratio.

#Cricket
4/n

5. This thread is about centuries, had i included failures it would have exposed Virat badly ( England tour 2014, NZ tour 2020).

Even after these factors Sachin& #39;s ratio 5.83 >>> Virat& #39;s ratio 4.40.

I didn& #39;t wanted to do this thread but have to stop fake propogandas.

5/n