Comparison of Sachin's 17 SENA Test 100s vs Virat's 11 SENA Test 100s :-

Sachin's avg in those matches - 208.5
Average of all other batsmen - 35.77

Ratio = 208.5/35.77 = 5.83

Virat's avg in those matches - 144.0
Average of other batsmen - 32.7

Ratio = 144.0/32.7 = 4.40

1/n

Comparing Sachin's & Virat's ratio :-
5.83>>>4.40

Ratio of ratios = 5.83/4.40 = 1.33

Conclusion :-

Sachin's centuries in SENA had 33% more impact than Virat's centuries in SENA, very big difference.

Some important points in next part :-

#Cricket
2/n

1. Sachin played with batting stalwarts like Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag, Ganguly hence reducing his ratio which could have been even higher.

2. There is no legend level batsman in Virat's team which boosted his ratio.

#Cricket
3/n

3. India currently has best bowling attack reducing other batsmen average hence increasing Virat's ratio.

4. India's earlier bowling attack struggled overseas increasing other batsmen average hence reducing Sachin's ratio.

#Cricket
4/n

5. This thread is about centuries, had i included failures it would have exposed Virat badly ( England tour 2014, NZ tour 2020).

Even after these factors Sachin's ratio 5.83 >>> Virat's ratio 4.40.

I didn't wanted to do this thread but have to stop fake propogandas.

5/n