Read on Twitter
How @MerriamWebster created a glitch in the matrix.
A THREAD.
Merriam Webster have decided this is their definition of
"๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ"
: ๐ข ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ : ๐ข ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ด ๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ต ๐ฃ๐ช๐ณ๐ต๐ฉ
OK.
A THREAD.
Merriam Webster have decided this is their definition of
"๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ"
: ๐ข ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ : ๐ข ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ด ๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ต ๐ฃ๐ช๐ณ๐ต๐ฉ
OK.
But what, I wonder, do MW mean by ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ and by ๐ข๐๐ก๐?
Let& #39;s see.
Let& #39;s see.
First here& #39;s the definition of ๐ข๐๐ก๐:
: ๐ข ๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฏ : ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐บ
Obviously this is circular. It& #39;s more of a naming protocol for our own species, than a definition. And also it& #39;s in the wrong place, since the primary definition belongs at the top.
: ๐ข ๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฏ : ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐บ
Obviously this is circular. It& #39;s more of a naming protocol for our own species, than a definition. And also it& #39;s in the wrong place, since the primary definition belongs at the top.
: ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ด๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ, ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐๐จ (๐ด๐ถ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ข๐ด ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ป๐ฐ๐ข)
contd...
contd...
๐ธ๐ฉ๐ช๐ค๐ฉ ๐ง๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ป๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ข ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐
The primary definition of male (applies not just to our species) is this one. (b)
About ๐จ๐๐ญ, ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐๐จ and ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข.
The primary definition of male (applies not just to our species) is this one. (b)
About ๐จ๐๐ญ, ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐๐จ and ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข.
So, to elucidate their definition of "๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ", we can drop the full definition of male in place.
The definition then becomes this
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="๐" title="Rรผckhand Zeigefinger nach unten" aria-label="Emoji: Rรผckhand Zeigefinger nach unten">
The definition then becomes this
: ๐ข ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ด๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ, ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐๐จ (๐ด๐ถ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ข๐ด ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข ...
๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ป๐ฐ๐ข) ๐ข๐ต ๐ฃ๐ช๐ณ๐ต๐ฉ
And for the absolute avoidance of doubt, shall we look at what is what is meant by ๐จ๐๐ญ?
And for the absolute avoidance of doubt, shall we look at what is what is meant by ๐จ๐๐ญ?
Sex : ๐ฆ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ฐ๐ค๐ค๐ถ๐ณ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฏ๐บ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ฆ๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ถ๐ช๐ด๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐ข๐ด ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ข๐๐ก๐...
๐ฆ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ด๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ช๐ณ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ค๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ง๐ช๐๐ฉ๐ช๐ง๐๐จ)
Ok.
But what the heck do they mean by ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ?
They define ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ as this:
: ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ถ๐ญ๐ต ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฏ
Ok.
But what the heck do they mean by ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ?
They define ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ as this:
: ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ถ๐ญ๐ต ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฏ
Seems fine. Do they define what they mean by ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐?
Yes. Yes they do.
๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ is this:
: ๐ฐ๐ง, ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฐ, ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ
Yes. Yes they do.
๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ is this:
: ๐ฐ๐ง, ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฐ, ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ
Shall we put it all together? Let& #39;s.
The Merriam Webster definition of
"๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ" is now finally and fully clarified as this:
The Merriam Webster definition of
"๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ" is now finally and fully clarified as this:
: ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ถ๐ญ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ช๐ด...
๐ต๐บ๐ฑ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ค๐ข๐ฑ๐ข๐ฃ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ค๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ด๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ, ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฉ๐๐จ (๐ด๐ถ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ข๐ด ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ป๐ฐ๐ข) ๐ข๐ต ๐ฃ๐ช๐ณ๐ต๐ฉ.
In short, Merriam Webster are trying to tell us that a "๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ" is literally the sex that makes eggs whilst being of the sex that makes sperm.
๐๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ
See?
Pear shaped.
A glitch in the matrix.
๐๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐๐ซ๐ฌ
See?
Pear shaped.
A glitch in the matrix.
And that& #39;s what happens when you tell a little white lie and haven& #39;t the balls to extrapolate it all the way to it& #39;s logical conclusion.
You& #39;re stuck with a visibly outrageous whopper.
๐๐ด๐ด๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐
You& #39;re stuck with a visibly outrageous whopper.
๐๐ด๐ด๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐บ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐
To make the impossible possible, or as Merriam Webster have done here, tried to make sperm producers (men) be & #39;recognised& #39; as egg producers (women), I& #39;m afraid you can& #39;t just shoehorn a single new definition in and hope people don& #39;t notice it doesn& #39;t fit.
Oho no.
Oho no.
No, to make the impossible possible, you have to redefine EVERYTHING so it all slots together again.
That means sex/woman/man/female/male/egg/sperm/gametes/reproduction.
They ALL have to be changed, or deleted.
Because otherwise there will always be a glitch in the matrix.
That means sex/woman/man/female/male/egg/sperm/gametes/reproduction.
They ALL have to be changed, or deleted.
Because otherwise there will always be a glitch in the matrix.
Or, and this is my personal preference, we just stick to the truth in the first place.
Just a thought.
#SexMatters
/END
Just a thought.
#SexMatters
/END
