Private institutions have every right to choose whether or not people have to wear masks on their property. The State, however, does not get to make that decision on behalf of everybody. Nobody is telling you NOT to wear a masks. We are saying it's wrong for you to force others.
You think it's minor, but it's not small enough to where the State won't murder you in the event you choose to resist. Ask Eric Garner.

You are encouraging and ensuring conflict with a murderous institution (the State) but you think it's fine because you agree with the policy.
Because folks don't think beyond surface level, of they can't fathom how someone could disagree with the idea of the State being used to handle "no maskers."

This isn't about whether or not you think people SHOULD wear masks. This is about you trying to legislate your morality.
Covid-19 is a virus that the vast majority of people will get, and be fine. Others will get it, and may get a severe reaction. This in itself is not new and predates Covid-19. Yet for the other bacteria and viruses it was never assumed you needed state-mandated masks
Be as cautious as you like. Nobody I know is advocating that people go cough on grandmas. That could be aggression. You can encourage others to be careful. But you become the aggressor when you advocate for the State to force people to cover their faces
You can follow @EricDJuly.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: