Lessons from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jun/26/leading-scientist-criticises-uk-over-its-climate-record
*a">https://www.theguardian.com/environme... knowledge campaign geared towards poorer 60% in democracies gets majority for changehttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🖖" title="„Live long and prosper!“" aria-label="Emoji: „Live long and prosper!“">
*CO2 pricing doesn& #39;t lead to quick --CO2. The rich will just pay it bc they can. The poor will bc they have to; they& #39;ll cut back on other things firsthttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤷‍♀️" title="Achselzuckende Frau" aria-label="Emoji: Achselzuckende Frau"> https://twitter.com/anlomedad/status/1277183994254237697">https://twitter.com/anlomedad...

In our high-risk-project in 2020, w/ only 222Gt CO2 left for what IPCC calls "1.5C", reduction amount &speed must be predictable, not based on "thoughts &prayers" or voluntary action &nudging.

Going forward, price-thinking perpetuates the delusion of having 3 earths to exploit.

Price-thinking is based on assuming CO2(eq) r a luxury item like a yacht or caviar.
But it& #39;s not. The amount essential for a relatively good life for all 7.5bn people -in our reduction phase now as well as after migrating to RE- leaves nothing for selling CO2 rights to richer ppl

CO2e isn& #39;t a commodity that can be traded w/, nor can the amount needed for basic! human life be further cut to allow others more CO2e. There simply is no surplus.

A decision where CO2e can be emitted therefore can& #39;t be left to those who can afford it.
Common good must decide.