Read on Twitter
Alright folks. Gather round for another episode of "Lets dissect this stupid ass tweet that should have never left the drafts" (1/x) https://twitter.com/Delmo222/status/1276949547881824257">https://twitter.com/Delmo222/...
Women not dressing like pilgrims does not mean they& #39;re solely using their body to bring in views. Women don& #39;t have to please you and should be respected regardless of clothing. Secondly, even if they are using their physical appearance to do so that& #39;s none of your business. (2/x)
Someone displaying their body in no way diminishes their worth as a human or has a negative impact on their content. Additionally, who the fuck are you to be the arbiter of what good content is? Also, someone having an Onlyfans doesn& #39;t make them subhuman you dumb cuck(3/x)
You seem to think this is a compliment but you& #39;ve already established that your view of women is intrinsically rooted in their bodies. What you& #39;re saying here is "I think most female (MTG) content creators are sluts and I like these 3 because imo they aren& #39;t thots(4/x)
You can signal boost female content creators without 1. Putting other women down because they make you feel sexually insecure. 2. Undermining the accomplishments of the people you promote by prefacing their exposure with sexual objectification.(5/x)
In conclusion. You& #39;re a hating ass, fuck ass, misogynist ass, worthless ass nigga, that& #39;s why you ain& #39;t got no money, nobody likes you.
P.S. The world would be a better place if you had been left in a condom. (6/6)
P.S. The world would be a better place if you had been left in a condom. (6/6)
Neckbeards literally objectified women forever and now are magically mad that said women are capitalizing on a market they didn& #39;t create.
We all know this dork slid into someone’s DMs like this and got rejected now he’s big mad.
