Read on Twitter
Serious question. For submissives who believe they should not be in any sort of provider role with their Domme, what value do they believe they bring to her life?
Is it simply to be an outlet for her kink?
Is it simply to be an outlet for her kink?
Is this a heteronormative imbalance of expectation?
Is the acceptable value of a female submissive to a Dom simply being an outlet to his kink?
Is this simply bc women typically gatekeep access to sex?
Is it unfair to expect male submissives to provide more?
Is the acceptable value of a female submissive to a Dom simply being an outlet to his kink?
Is this simply bc women typically gatekeep access to sex?
Is it unfair to expect male submissives to provide more?
Is this simply an issue of supply and demand?
I really am quite curious to hear thoughts on this.
Daily, I receive messages from male submissives offering their kink list to me unsolicited & also expressing they are only interested if it’s “free.”
Daily, I receive messages from male submissives offering their kink list to me unsolicited & also expressing they are only interested if it’s “free.”
What is the thought process? That dominant women need a supply of male submissives to beat & peg so that they don’t implode from unexpressed kink & therefore they are offering their flesh as tribute?
I want to believe the answer is more nuanced than “thinking with their dick” and “women are expected to serve men even if in a dominant role.”
Is there an role inversion where the male hopes that the Domme will be *his* provider? Taking him like a cherished pet & providing for his various needs from sexual to emotional to financial?
Enlighten me!
I really wish all the “Eggs” on twitter who DM me these kinds of messages were able to form complete thoughts to answer my curiosity, but alas...I have my doubts that the “Eggs” do such things...
I really wish all the “Eggs” on twitter who DM me these kinds of messages were able to form complete thoughts to answer my curiosity, but alas...I have my doubts that the “Eggs” do such things...
. @jackKneels & I have discussed variations on this many times — how female submissives are often able to provide a list of their desires to a male Dom with ease, but the same is frowned upon when male submissives do it.
(Of course, there are exceptions.)
(Of course, there are exceptions.)
So, I am generally inquisitive to get a broad sampling of opinion on this.
I mean, I don’t think it will make me start taking in those “live-in sub” guys that randomly cut & paste mass spam us, but still...the mind ponders such mysteries.
I mean, I don’t think it will make me start taking in those “live-in sub” guys that randomly cut & paste mass spam us, but still...the mind ponders such mysteries.
Is it the idea & hope that the Domme does not need anything from a man, or at least, specifically, from the submissive in question?
He simply a toy for her whims, but otherwise never needed to provide for her?
This making their exchange (& her desire for him) “pure”?
He simply a toy for her whims, but otherwise never needed to provide for her?
This making their exchange (& her desire for him) “pure”?
Is this simply a case of these subs being “romantics”?! 
