80. Procedure is that a copy of an affidavit is served on the other side’s legal representative, here the ACT Govt Solicitor. Peter Garrison, Chief Solicitor since 2004, commenced with the GSO in 1999 as Deputy Chief Solicitor & was unable to produce the original. #fraud
81. If the ACT Government Solicitor was served with a copy of the Mullins affidavit in 2013 with a original ACAT stamp as alleged, why did they not tender it into evidence in 2017 in the ACT Supreme Court? #corruption #BlackLivesMatter #racism
82. But the strangest point is why Mullins’ lawyers were billing him for preparing the affidavit (bills being paid) 3 weeks after the 2013 date on the affidavit produced in court by the AFP. #fraud
83. During the trial, Pham swore she'd received no written complaints from Mullins regarding racism. Pham’s testimony was untruthful. This letter references a complaint dated 9 December 2003 & supports other references already in this thread.
84. Mullins comments at his dismissal in 2004 that he hade been the victim of a “fit-up” & responses went undocumented. The ACT DPP attempted to submit minutes without attendee signatures at the 2017 trial; no one recognized them and they were not tendered. #corruption
85. Howard Ronaldson has consistently acknowledged the veracity of the letter of 9 May 2002. In the ACT Supreme Court, he swore that he received the letter of 9 May 2002 and that the copy in Mullins possession held his original signature.
86. Forensic analysis of the copy sent to Mullins with Ronaldson’s original signature determined that the signature is genuine, supporting Ronaldson’s assertion to its authenticity and the contents of the letter.
87. The prosecution argued Mullins could not have spoken to AFP Officer Mark Coppin on 9 May 2002 regarding Marina’s letter as Coppin was not on duty. The Civic Police Station cell log from that day demonstrates otherwise.
88. In addition records accessed regarding Darren Bloomfield who was in the cells that day provide further evidence that AFP Officer Coppin was on duty the day that Mullins attempted to lodge a complaint about Marina’s racism.
89. Ultimately, the combination of the many inconsistencies & Mullins argument that the affidavit on which he was being prosecuted was not his creation was accepted by the jury. Mullins was found not guilty on all 16 counts. #BlackLivesMatter #Justice4Mullins
90. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the affidavit tendered into evidence by the AFP was a forgery & there was a clear attempt to fit up an innocent man. The jury saw through the inconsistencies. Why did the AFP proceed with charges and force a costly trial?
You can follow @Watershedd.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: