Parler, the Twitter alternative that bills itself as a bastion of the First Amendment, explicitly tells users not to post rumors and advises against posting content that is “sexual in nature” because porn is banned.

Nothing says “well-reasoned and unbiased indecency standard” like “clauses defined by the FCC”

Parler has basically a reverse 230 clause in its terms of service, allowing the company to bill users for legal fees relating to their posts. @jkosseff

I have never seen a bigger red flag in a privacy policy than this clause from Parler