Thread by @Koorivlf, If minors want to have a sfw minor space under the name [...]

Koorivlf but Sleepy

Koorivlf

If minors want to have a sfw minor space under the name of "fluffy" this seems fine

Making a sub category for the fandom is normal. That& #39;s how you get grey muzzles or scalies. That& #39;s a good idea and should be encouraged.

There are real criticisms though like:
- the burned-

furs are a part of furry history that is still around in different forms. So fluffies would need to make sure its not co-opted

- it should be a sub category, not a new fandom. Furries are not an inherntly sexual thing, but more labels like that can help groups better operate

different spaces

- making it a minor space would be good but making the label available to adults to make more sfw adult spaces would be helpful. Otherwise those who like primarily sfw stuff may get removed which would suck. Maybe call adult fluffs "grey fluffs".

- the rating system of what is sfw needs to actually be sfw. Otherwise you& #39;re gonna get pedos going "its sfw enough" in DMs and that will not be ok.

- there would still need to be an understanding that sex, sexuality, etc are not bad,

but that not every furry space needs to focus on that or be a core-side aspedt. Fluffies making sex/sexuality inherntly bad as a concept in the fluffy space will cause a burned fur group 2.0 if not careful

- please dont just make a paw as the symbol. Theres so many artists and

Graphic designers. We can do better than a paw that looks like every other paw.

So ya, unless I& #39;m missing info, crapping on a minor& #39;s idea of a sfw minor space is pretty bad. That shouldnt happen. Fluffies as a subcategory seem cool. Minors deserve to be in the fandom too

You can follow @Koorivlf.

Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: