Read on Twitter
If Verri can't admit there is a fundamental difference between being attracted to and masturbating to real photos of child actors, then they need to re-evaluate. Whether the child sees it or not, justifying using the likeness of real children to jack off is always wrong.+
Their statements are, once again, NOT in regards to fictional content. Verri is justifying specifically using photographs of real children to masturbate to.
Claiming that it's "ok" to use photographs of real children to jack off when if they are playing a character in a TV show+
Claiming that it's "ok" to use photographs of real children to jack off when if they are playing a character in a TV show+
Is deceptive, and it blurs a necessary boundary when it comes to fictional content.
It erases the personhood of the child actor. Even if they are playing a character on screen, that is still their real life body you are lusting after. That is still a real life child.+
It erases the personhood of the child actor. Even if they are playing a character on screen, that is still their real life body you are lusting after. That is still a real life child.+
I guarantee that those kids aren't Unaware of what is happening either. At this point, I am sure they are aware their bodies and their personhood are being exploited.
This also begs the question, why are people gunning so hard to justify masturbating to photographs of these+
This also begs the question, why are people gunning so hard to justify masturbating to photographs of these+
Real life children's bodies? Why not just outright say that these live action child characters are still played by CHILD actors?
Why not admit the distinction between Will Byres and N*ah Shn*pp without using the argument to justify jacking off to photographs of him?+
Why not admit the distinction between Will Byres and N*ah Shn*pp without using the argument to justify jacking off to photographs of him?+
A photograph of an adult in a bikini, which they themselves say they don't mind being viewed sexually is NOT THE SAME as using photographs of children to masturbate to.
Claiming that you "don't get it" and then continuing to justify that you're correct either way is ignorant+
Claiming that you "don't get it" and then continuing to justify that you're correct either way is ignorant+
And incredibly dangerous.
If you don't understand, stop trying to argue your position that it's Okay To Jack off to Real Kids if They're Playing A Character on TV/If They Never See It, and start LISTENING to what other people are trying to communicate to you.+
If you don't understand, stop trying to argue your position that it's Okay To Jack off to Real Kids if They're Playing A Character on TV/If They Never See It, and start LISTENING to what other people are trying to communicate to you.+
That is why people are angry and upset with you, Verri. The fact you are doing something genuinely harmful, but are discounting any argument against you because you and the people you're defending don't want to stop jacking off to photographs of children.
That is the real issue.
That is the real issue.
