Read on Twitter
If Verri can& #39;t admit there is a fundamental difference between being attracted to and masturbating to real photos of child actors, then they need to re-evaluate. Whether the child sees it or not, justifying using the likeness of real children to jack off is always wrong.+
Their statements are, once again, NOT in regards to fictional content. Verri is justifying specifically using photographs of real children to masturbate to.
Claiming that it& #39;s "ok" to use photographs of real children to jack off when if they are playing a character in a TV show+
Claiming that it& #39;s "ok" to use photographs of real children to jack off when if they are playing a character in a TV show+
Is deceptive, and it blurs a necessary boundary when it comes to fictional content.
It erases the personhood of the child actor. Even if they are playing a character on screen, that is still their real life body you are lusting after. That is still a real life child.+
It erases the personhood of the child actor. Even if they are playing a character on screen, that is still their real life body you are lusting after. That is still a real life child.+
I guarantee that those kids aren& #39;t Unaware of what is happening either. At this point, I am sure they are aware their bodies and their personhood are being exploited.
This also begs the question, why are people gunning so hard to justify masturbating to photographs of these+
This also begs the question, why are people gunning so hard to justify masturbating to photographs of these+
Real life children& #39;s bodies? Why not just outright say that these live action child characters are still played by CHILD actors?
Why not admit the distinction between Will Byres and N*ah Shn*pp without using the argument to justify jacking off to photographs of him?+
Why not admit the distinction between Will Byres and N*ah Shn*pp without using the argument to justify jacking off to photographs of him?+
A photograph of an adult in a bikini, which they themselves say they don& #39;t mind being viewed sexually is NOT THE SAME as using photographs of children to masturbate to.
Claiming that you "don& #39;t get it" and then continuing to justify that you& #39;re correct either way is ignorant+
Claiming that you "don& #39;t get it" and then continuing to justify that you& #39;re correct either way is ignorant+
