Read on Twitter
Rachael Swindon is toxic.
Just saying.
Just saying.
https://twitter.com/Rachael_Swindon/status/1275343263277428737?s=19">https://twitter.com/Rachael_S...
Here& #39;s me making that point again: https://twitter.com/TheDryhtscipe/status/1275391540135972865?s=20">https://twitter.com/TheDryhts...
(Someone called Matt then said he didn& #39;t feel they were slurs, which is fair: most people do not know they are. Nonetheless, they are insults, which still imo makes them *toxic*. At any rate:) https://twitter.com/TheDryhtscipe/status/1275395059555368967?s=20">https://twitter.com/TheDryhts...
https://twitter.com/TheDryhtscipe/status/1275395275503423488?s=20">https://twitter.com/TheDryhts...
https://twitter.com/TheDryhtscipe/status/1275395415895138304?s=20">https://twitter.com/TheDryhts...
https://twitter.com/TheDryhtscipe/status/1275395560695103488?s=20">https://twitter.com/TheDryhts...
I& #39;d be happy, still, of course, to accept an entirely reasonable apology for bad behaviour on @Rachael_Swindon& #39;s part. People make mistakes. They do, then, however, ideally learn from them.
I won& #39;t, however, be apologising for calling out that bad behaviour. The word "toxic" is neither an insult nor a slur; if we cannot identify bad behaviour with labels for it, then we cannot ever call it out or see it corrected.
