If you& #39;re just learning about K-pop / @BTS_twt /ARMY, you may wonder why ARMY claims itself as its own instead of "K-pop fandom", or why publications like @TheR3Journal, @revolt_twt, @BorasaekVision, @Revolution_mag_ etc are focused only on BTS and not K-pop as a whole.

(1/10)
I can& #39;t speak for all these publications and all ARMY, but as an ARMY myself and member of @The3Journal, this is the perspective I& #39;ll give.
It& #39;s simple. @BTS_twt / ARMY are their own category. This may sound like a personal opinion, but it can be objectively explained.

(2/10)
Really, whenever a topic, a group, a thing, anything, is complex enough to be distinguished from its peers, it can be considered autonomous from it. It doesn& #39;t have to be hierarchical, it doesn& #39;t have to be personal, although it can be.

(3/10)
It& #39;s just about one thing having enough particularities that differentiate it from others.

(My academic background is Law so this is how it& #39;s easy
for me to visualize it. Hopefully I& #39;m explaining it in a way that others can understand too.)

(4/10)
Law is separated in different fields. They have to be somewhat cohesive, and can communicate and influentiate each other sometimes, but they *need* to be studied separately & have their own separate rules.

(At least in Romano-germanic law systems like my country& #39;s)

(5/10)
In legal taxonomy, one Law field may have subfields. For example: Copyrights is a species under the Intellectual Property genre, but it is VERY different from other Intellectual Property species.
Having a common origin does *not* mean all rules from the main genre apply.

(6/10)
Classification separates things to better understand how they work, either alone or altogether. If you put 2 things that have different history, composition, achieve different results etc in the same classification, you& #39;ll come to inaccurate conclusions about them.

(7/10)
Back to @BTS_twt / K-pop, you don& #39;t really need to love or hate neither to see how they& #39;re interconnected yet can definitely be distinguished.
Saying that a subcategory or a related category is its own category does not necessarily equal bashing the other categories.

(8/10)
That said, you can like K-pop and still acknowledge that @BTS_twt transcended it. (I do)
Or you can like only BTS.
It& #39;s your right to like whatever.
And, sometimes, a lot of people like it enough for it to become too big & complex to belong in a preexisting category.
(9/10)
What @BTS_twt has done & does (in artform, cultural impact and commercial success), and what ARMY is like & acts like, is different enough to deserve their own category amongst music groups / pop and K-pop fandoms. It& #39;s just that.

(10/10)
You can follow @magicshopbooks.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: