We must always remember that any bad news about the sussexes and their ventures is a cover up for that vampiric family.

We didn’t hear the press report this “blow”

@KaiseratCB see their antics

Remember when they said Harry was getting hair treatments and we saw baldy spouting baby hair?

Is it far fetched to state that after bald and Kant got this message, they sent their minions to keep an eye on the sussexes trademarks too?

To add to the thread, the previous foundation consent was given and it was filed under their actual names. But this time around it wasn’t also they have no US lawyer representing them. See attached images of new and old foundation 1/

The sussexes have a US attorney and I think they literally trademarked everything trademarkable so no one can use that name for anything at all. And it’s filed under a firm so I think it might be part of a foundation not the foundation name itself. See image.

Archwell vs royal foundation one is undergoing irregularities and one is refused which one do we hear about in the press? You guessed right the sussexes.

@UKRoyalTea don’t ever fix your biased mouth to accuse Meghan and Harry of delaying the launch of their foundation not because of BLM/COVID but because their trademark was denied 1/

@UKRoyalTea I have been very patient with sycophantic plebs like you, if you learn not to keep Harry and Meghan’s name out of your mouth. I will stuff it full of receipts, only one trademark was refused and it wasn’t Harry and Meghan’s.

Tell your overlords @UKRoyalTea to fix their issues, as you can see they have no protection over that name, if they keep playing I might have to trademark it myself.