#FDA recently approved #pembrolizumab- a tissue agnostic indication in metastatic tumors with high #TMB (>10 mut/MB) using Foundation One Dx companion diagnostic test. I want to share a tweetorial on why this indication could be problematic and hope to share some nuances on #TMB
I hope to cover the following
What is TMB ?
Why is it important?
Controversy regarding appropriate cut-offs for TMB
Finally KN-158-study based on which the approval was gained






https://bit.ly/2BgbYSt (Lawrence et al)
https://bit.ly/2YfWRS5 (Alexandrov et al)
Lawrence et al had
3,083 tumor/normal pairs across 27 tumors, 2,957 whole-exome and 126 whole-genome

Alexandrov et al had
7,042 samples of 30 tumor types (507 whole genome and 6,535 exomes)
Both showed tumors towards the right not only had higher mutation burden-but also had the most success with immunotherapy initially
BTW both papers are one of the most highly cited



Tumor mutations creates targets for T-cell recognition=
neoantigens
TMB was thought to be a surrogate marker for neoantigen burden
immunogenecity
susceptibility to checkpoint blockade
Random slide on tumor mutations





Random slide on tumor mutations
First two papers to validate this:
Snyder et al in melanoma with CTLA-4 blockade https://bit.ly/3fPDup5
Rizvi et al in NSCLC with PD-L1 blockade https://bit.ly/2AOYPzW
#TMB determined by whole exome sequencing (protein coding regions of 20,000 genes or~1% whole genome)





Next comes our friendly assay #FoundationOne
~300+ gene panel (only a subset of entire exome/20,000 genes)
Only mutations in tumor specimens (no germline comparison)-bioinformatically filter out potential germline variants (not perfect)
Both synonymous & non-synonymous



First they showed a good concordance between #TMB determined by whole-exome approach and the #FoundationOne panel ( https://bit.ly/3eiJHcs )
Next they showed that Higher #TMB by #FoundationOne was a/w betters outcome with single agent anti-PD1 (RR, PFS and OS) compared to low or intermediate #TMB by @PatelOncology @Dr_R_Kurzrock
https://bit.ly/2AS7nG9
Interestingly, this finding was not true with nivo+ipi combo
https://bit.ly/2AS7nG9


High #TMB >20 mut/MB (roughly 270 mut/exome)
Intermediate #TMB 6-19 mut/MB
Low #TMB 1-5 mut/MB
Clever paper by @MarkYarchoan from @hopkinskimmel showed correlation between response-rate and #TMB as continuous variable (no cut-off) https://bit.ly/3dejQ4m
Why did #FoundationOne 's definition of High TMB change over time from 20 mut/MB to 10 mut/MB , what was the justification?
This was the best I could find.
This was the best I could find.
Based off-retrospective studies of CM-026, 012 and 568, where in ROC curve of #TMB by ORR, beyond 10 mut/Mb the ORR plateaued. Basis of CM-227, the first prospective clinical trial using #TMB >10 mut/MB in NSCLC which was also predictive of PFS benefit https://bit.ly/2zKz3wh
Lastly, KN-158 study- prospectively-planned retrospective analysis of 10 cohorts of patients with various previously treated unresectable or metastatic TMB-H solid tumors enrolled in a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label trial receiving pembrolizumab, ORR as primary endpoint
This is the most important table: Thanks to @agrothey for providing this. The approval was based off of these 100 patients in 10 tumor types












Curious to hear thoughts from the experts @VivekSubbiah @Dr_R_Kurzrock @StephenVLiu @n8pennell @VPrasadMDMPH @oncology_bg @Alfdoc2 @PatelOncology @JackWestMD @FAndreMD @DSolit @CharuAggarwalMD