People should maybe take ten minutes to understand the legal process before they go on air and couch it in language intended to make the claim sound frivolous. https://twitter.com/SeanyeWest234/status/1273852802209476608
For starters, you do not need to make a Freedom of Information request to see a claim. In general, court pleadings are publicly available, absent a publication ban. In particular, in this case, as in most class actions, the pleading is available on class counsel's website.
"The plaintiff, in this case, if you want to call them that". What is that? They are the plaintiffs. Period.

FWIW, plaintiffs' counsel is a Band 1 ranked firm in Chambers Canada. They were also Benchmark Litigation's 2018 plaintiff class action firm of the year.
This segment alleges that this is a "cooked up" and "baseless" claim. This is a serious allegation to make against not only survivors (plural), but also against reputable legal counsel. It's incredibly irresponsible.
Further the idea that this doesn't match reality now is irrelevant. This is a claim based on historical conduct. There is no limitation on sexual assault, sexual misconduct or physical assault of minors.

The idea that the justice system is not the right way to do this? Gross.
To say you're not victim blaming (after engaging in classic victim shaming), and then say you have to consider the source and attack Carcillo? What???

Gonna go take six showers now to rid myself of how gross that entire segment was.
JK I'M NOT DONE.

You don't just get to say someone should be in prison.

Jesus.
Fucking.
Christ.
You can follow @samanthacp_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: