THIS THREAD HAS EXHAUSTED ME,
DEAR READERS, PLEASE DO READ MY LONGEST THREAD EVER.

In the backdrop of Chinese Aggression & Chinese Gandhis Nefarious Ways of Attacking Modi Govt Using Their Slaves,
Knowing What Happened Between July and December 1950 Is Important.

In the month of October 1950, China Invaded Tibet and on November 7th , 38 Days Before His Death, The Deputy Prime Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel wrote to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru….

Let's Read What Made Patel Write To Nehru, Later Will Read What Was Written In It.

Few Months Before The Attack On Tibet, #GirijaShankarBajpai, the secretary-general of the ministry of external affairs and Commonwealth relations warned Sardar Patel about K M Panikker, the ambassador to China & Nehru’s blue eyed boy (bootlicker).
On July 15, 1950, the governor

of Assam informed Delhi that, according to the information received by the local intelligence bureau, Chinese troops, “in unknown strength, had been moving towards Tibet from three directions.” Not only was Panikkar unable to get any confirmation, but he virtually justified

Beijing’s military action by writing: “In view of frustration in regard to Formosa, the Tibetan move was not unlikely.” During the next three months, Panikker systematically take the Chinese side.
After receiving Bajpai’s note, Patel wrote back: “I need hardly say that I have

read it with a great deal of interest and profit to myself and it has resulted in a much better understanding of the points at issue and general, though serious, nature of the problem. The Chinese advance into Tibet upsets all our security calculations. … I entirely agree with

you that a reconsideration of our military position and a redisposition of our forces are inescapable.”
Several senior Congress leaders, led by Patel, violently oppose Nehru’s suicidal policy, but many senior bureaucrats too did not agree with the Prime Minister’s decisions and

objected to his policy of appeasement with China, which led India to lose a peaceful border.
Some more details of the seriousness of the situation filters through Inside Story of Sardar Patel: The Diary of Maniben Patel, the daughter of the Sardar. In an entry

on November 2, 1950, Maniben wrote: “Rajaji and Jawaharlal had a heated altercation about the Tibet policy. Rajaji does not at all appreciate this policy. Rajaji very unhappy — Bapu (Patel) did not speak at all.”
Later in the afternoon, “Munshi complained to Sardar about Tibet

policy. (He Ensured Completion Of Somanath Temple After Sardar’s Demise)
Sardar Replied - The question concerns the whole nation and I have written a personal letter to Panditji on Tibet.”
In fact The Said Letter Which Patel Wrote To Nehru Was A Draft Prepared By Girija Shankar

NOW THE LETTER
“The Chinese government has tried to delude us by professions of peaceful intention… They managed to instil into our Ambassador a false sense of confidence in their so called desire to settle the Tibetan problem by peaceful means... The action of the Chinese, in

my judgment, is little short of perfidy.”
Patel in his letter described in detail the situation along the northern border of Bharat and warned against the possibility of invasion and advised the Government of India to take action.
“… even though we regard ourselves as friends

of China, the Chinese do not regard us as their friends. With the Communist mentality of 'whoever is not with them being against them', this is a significant pointer, of which we have take due note,”
“During the last several months, outside the Russian camp, we have practically

been alone in championing the cause of Chinese entry into the UNO, and in securing from the Americans assurances on the question of Formosa(Taiwan). We have done everything we could to assuage Chinese feelings, to allay its apprehension and to defend its legitimate claims, in

our discussions and correspondence with America and Britain and in the UNO. In spite of this, China is not convinced about our disinterestedness, it continues to regard us with suspicion and the whole psychology is one, at least outwardly of scepticism, perhaps mixed with a

little hostility, I doubt if we can go any further than we have done already to convince China of our good intentions, friendliness and goodwill," he added.
NEHRU CHOSE TO IGNORE THIS LETTER.
Sardar Patel was deeply hurt, On November 11, 1950, Sardar addressed meeting organised

by the Central Aryan Association to commemorate the 67th death anniversary of Swami Dayanand Saraswati. It was to be his last speech. What did he say? The Sardar spoke of the potential dangers arising from what was happening in Tibet and Nepal, and he called his countrymen:

“It was incumbent on the people to rise above party squabbles and unitedly defend their newly-won freedom.”
He criticised the Chinese intervention in Tibet; he asserted that to use the “sword” against the traditionally peace-loving Tibetan people was unjustified:

“No other country in the world was as peace-loving as Tibet. Bharat did not believe, therefore, that the Chinese government would actually use force in settling the Tibetan question.”
“Do not let cowardice cripple you. Do not run away from danger. The three year-old freedom of

the country has to be fully protected. India today is surrounded by all sorts of dangers and it is for the people today to remember the teachings of the two great saints and face fearlessly all dangers.”
“In this kalyug we shall return ahimsa for ahimsa. But if anybody resorted

to force against us we shall meet it with force.” He ended his speech citing Swami Dayananda: “People should also remember that Swamiji did not get a foreign education. He was the product of Indian culture. Although it was true that they in Bharat had to borrow whatever was

good and useful from other countries, it was right and proper that Indian culture was accorded its due place.”
The Highly Paid Acting Liberals of this country hails Nehru as a beacon of socialism, Visionary with farsightedness, Statesman who built International Relations but the

truth is that his failures as the prime minister of Bharat are too many. The problem of Pakistan, Kashmir, China, Aksai Chin, giving up of UNSC seat for China, Distorting our history and countless other failures are gifts of Nehru to Bharat.

FINISHING IN NEXT 2 THREAD

The original letter written by Patel is too long for twitter and hence I have taken photographs of it in MS WORD for clarity.
It is 8 Page, But Can Be Read In 4 Pages.
This letter is published in 4 books including his daughter
Maniben's Diary.

Sincere Thanks To #ClaudeArpi, the French-born author, journalist, historian and Tibetologist born in 1949.
Now he lives at Auroville, Aurobindo Ashrama, Puducheri.

@SadhuMaharaj16 @Kishoreciyer1 @vinirish @Seems3r @DPRArohana @wataboutery @kanimozhi @girishalva @KalpanaSubrama5 @savitha_rao @PplOfIndia @kansaratva @Lotusfeetns @NarenMenon1 @NAN_DINI_ @IndiaSpeaksPR @PrinceArihan @iRupND @KiranKS @Deshadanm