I remain astonished that after an entirely too long primary, when talking about Kamala Harris, ppl on Twitter and in the Media are still stuck on the June debate.

When discussing Sen Warren they NEVER mention the times she went ALL THE WAY IN on Joe.

Why is that? (THREAD) https://twitter.com/mmodi93/status/1273471749947088896
It was a debate!

You’re SUPPOSED to make your case. It’s politics and these are not disqualifying moments for ANYONE but tell me why in every article that gets written about Harris for VP, they keep coming back to this ONE MOMENT but ignore the numerous times Liz hot Joe HARD!!
Here’s the video of her saying Joe is “running in the wrong primary” as well as some other HUGE accusations such as Joe/Dems LOSE by using “Republican talking points” and is protecting insurance and drug companies

It’s important to not she flipped and now supports Joe on ACA https://twitter.com/khivequeenbee/status/1273611088186060800
This particular attack saying Joe is a “Washington insider” who will not “meet this moment” seems pretty standard but it’s important to note that this was AFTER Joe swept Super Tuesday and the other Major Dem contenders coalesced around Joe https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1147696
We all know primaries are rough and all that step into the arena hit and get hit.

Again, that BY NO MEANS should be disqualifying for an admin spot. Joe should build a team of rivals like Obama did.

Just know the mention of HARRIS ONLY is by design and meant to hurt her.
ADDENDUM: It was a primary. Liz making a distinction was her job. But if you’re being honest, what she said about Joe was MUCH MORE inflammatory than that debate moment. There’s a double standard and bias that BW face while WW get pass after pass. That’s what’s being called out.
You can follow @NovusDivus.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: