On herd immunity.

Herd immunity is when sufficiently high % of population are immune, so that an infected individual pass the infection to <1, thus an outbreak peters out on its own.
The most basic equation is 1-1/R0, where R0 is the # infected by the infected.

For Covid-19, R0 estimate is 2~3, although it varies by density, demographics, social structure, etc.

For US, assuming R0=2, you need 1-1/2=0.5, i.e. 50% of population has to be immune.
If you assume IFR=1.0%, that's ~1.65 million dead. Even if you assume IFR=0.5%, ~825 thousand dead.

The unknown is over what time period.

If immunity lasts 1 yr, the #s above are "per year".
If 10 yrs, 1/10th (165k, 83k), if near permanent (100 yrs), 1/100th (17k, 8k) per yr.
This is the main reason most knowledgeable people think the discussion of herd immunity is rather premature & reckless.

Are we willing to let 1.5~2mil/yr die? Or even 1/10th of that?

Just note that we have no herd immunity for many inf. diseases.
This is the most simplistic version. It could be worse (overshoot, etc.) or better in many ways, but we still don't know much yet. Many nuances I didn't cover.

Along w/ the discussion of herd immunity, I hear a lot of "protect the vulnerable" talk, as if that's easy.
Where was it successful? Swedes failed. So did most everyone. The only places where nursing homes, etc. weren't hit hard were those w/ low level of infection in the first place (e.g. Taiwan, S.Korea).

Nursing homes, etc. already do a lot. Expecting much more is unrealistic, IMO.
Look at the death tolls in these fairly young countries. Sure, better HC in the US, but not by much.

Does anyone think we can "isolate" enough seniors to only expose the demographics younger than these countries? I don't.
In fact, herd immunity strategy may be a realistic option in countries w/ limited HC resources & very young demographics. But many developing countries have successfully suppressed it, so that clearly isn't the only option.
Having said that, the situation is different in developed countries like US. We just have too many seniors.

Show me a successful strategy to protect the seniors (other than lowering overall infection levels), or stop considering it a realistic option.
Then what?

Many countries have (or getting close to) suppressed it well enough for something resembling "normal" w/o herd immunity or vaccine.

No need to eradicate (only smallpox in our history). We already live w/ many inf. diseases by suppressing them just enough.
Covid-19 may well become endemic in the next few decades. But, as one epidemiologist I follow said, the goal is to get there as painlessly as possible.

We're starting to see some promising treatments. Vaccine may become available in a year or two.
We're getting better at dealing w/ this everyday. Just "letting it rip til herd immunity" will be quite painful & may even be futile. We have no herd immunity for many endemic diseases, yet we manage.

Just my 2 cents on this "herd immunity" talk.
You can follow @KawasakiKR11.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: