USAF has realised there is a “Degraded readiness of the existing aerial refueling force, delays in KC46s, planned reductions of KC10s & KC135s ... indicate a critical and shortfall in taskable a/c ” 1/
And a report has been submitted to Congress
#general">https://beta.sam.gov/opp/54df80f9174646a9bb25b7f38f03dba4/view #general">https://beta.sam.gov/opp/54df8...
And a report has been submitted to Congress
#general">https://beta.sam.gov/opp/54df80f9174646a9bb25b7f38f03dba4/view #general">https://beta.sam.gov/opp/54df8...
They see this shortfall for the next 5-7 years.
USAF sent a report to Congress outlining 5 separate potential courses of actions. 2/
USAF sent a report to Congress outlining 5 separate potential courses of actions. 2/
1. Use contractors to fly USAF tankers.
This has potential legal and regulatory hurdles due to civilians flying US Goverment owned aircraft. Along with excess tankers being low. 3/
This has potential legal and regulatory hurdles due to civilians flying US Goverment owned aircraft. Along with excess tankers being low. 3/
2. Sell or lease surplus tankers to contractors.
Many USAF tankers are at airplane graveyards, however, the status of them is unknown. 4/
Many USAF tankers are at airplane graveyards, however, the status of them is unknown. 4/
3. Have contractors buy foreign tankers. Especially ones with BOOM.
The issue with this option could be spare parts / engineering / certification. Modifications would most likely need to be carried out on the BOOM. 5/
The issue with this option could be spare parts / engineering / certification. Modifications would most likely need to be carried out on the BOOM. 5/
4. Have contractors convert airliners.
This, of course, would require those companies to buy suitable aircraft, modify them, and certify them to meet the service& #39;s standards. 6/
This, of course, would require those companies to buy suitable aircraft, modify them, and certify them to meet the service& #39;s standards. 6/