I want to explain why we published the piece today by Senator Tom Cotton. https://nyti.ms/3dyvJ5Z ">https://nyti.ms/3dyvJ5Z&q...
The Times editorial board has forcefully defended the protests as patriotic and criticized the use of force, saying earlier today that police too often have “responded with more violence — against protesters, journalists and bystanders.” https://nyti.ms/3cvhjlR ">https://nyti.ms/3cvhjlR&q...
As part of our explorations of these issues, Times Opinion has published powerful arguments supporting protests, advocating fundamental change and criticizing police abuses.
https://nyti.ms/2ADdddY 
https://nyti.ms/2ADdddY&q... href=" https://nyti.ms/306Xizh 
https://nyti.ms/306Xizh&q... href=" https://nyti.ms/3dwVYd4 ">https://nyti.ms/3dwVYd4&q... https://nyti.ms/3cvjiGP ">https://nyti.ms/3cvjiGP&q...
Times Opinion owes it to our readers to show them counter-arguments, particularly those made by people in a position to set policy.
We understand that many readers find Senator Cotton& #39;s argument painful, even dangerous. We believe that is one reason it requires public scrutiny and debate.
You can follow @JBennet.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: