This might harm diversity. Forcing a VC to choose someone who *isn& #39;t a good bet* just to satisfy a diversity index isn& #39;t how the business works. It& #39;s not how any of this works.
Do you want a list of founders on one side, with successful exits, and founders on the other without? https://twitter.com/notgregkalai/status/1267012772698755072">https://twitter.com/notgregka...
Do you want a list of founders on one side, with successful exits, and founders on the other without? https://twitter.com/notgregkalai/status/1267012772698755072">https://twitter.com/notgregka...
If you read through this thread, you& #39;ll notice it& #39;s extremely "You& #39;re with us or you& #39;re against us," the classic false dichotomy. "Do this, or else."
This was appropriate when VCs were sexually harassing female founders. It feels mistaken to do it when VCs *simply aren& #39;t tweeting something*.
Are people going to force businesses to acquire startups from the diverse founder pool? You can& #39;t force success in a free market.