Read on Twitter
This week& #39;s vote by Hamilton City Council to shut down Sobi bike share was nothing short of an act of civic vandalism. /1
It was a destructive, senseless act fuelled by the kind of spiteful politics we can& #39;t seem to shed. A small politics that has held us back, weakened our city financially and that has compounded the challenges for our most vulnerable citizens. /2
One of the most basic tasks of an elected govt is to take care of the residents it serves, especially its most vulnerable residents & even more so during a pandemic. This week, Hamilton City Council failed in its service to all. /3
Since COVID, 600 residents have turned to Sobi for the 1st time, joining the ranks of 26K existing users. They were doing what health officials have been asking them to do. If you have to go out, practice physical distancing. Sobi bike-share allowed them to do just that. /4
This week& #39;s vote has put more of you in harm& #39;s way, especially front-line workers, exposing more residents to greater risk. If may have left you without a safe, affordable way to get to work at a time when recovery is uncertain & expenses are tight. I am truly sorry. /5
Hamilton& #39;s Sobi system exceeded everyone& #39;s expectations. It was the most successful mid-size city bike share program in North America. Politics, not performance, did it under @ a time when it& #39;s needed most. /6
COVID did not create Hamilton& #39;s ++$3 billion infrastructure deficit & our financial vulnerability. It merely exposed it. Indiscriminate capital spending on sprawl, offering little return on investment, has mortgaged our future. /7
Worse still, those with the very least are paying the most for such financial malfeasance while being denied access to the very places & spaces they are funding. /8
Just think, at the same mtg where Council killed Sobi we had to move forward with a 7 yr waste collection tender that cost $21M more. Last year, Council refused to allow staff to test for bi-weekly collection for environmental & efficiency reasons. /9
The motion that died on a tied vote, would have seen money coming from ward 1-3 area rating with no impact to the general levy. The money would have given staff the time to look for alternative bike-share operators (Uber bailed) & keep the bikes active & available to users./10
On full display, this Council term is contempt for those calling for a new kind of politics & reordering of public priorities to make Hamilton more resilient & equitable. Whether it& #39;s coming from inside or outside Council chambers, dissent is punishable. Bullying is fair game/11
This financial malfeasance, inconsistent spending rationales & parochial politics is particularly dangerous during a public health crisis. It will undermine efforts to make Hamilton more resilient, more equitable & more prosperous for more people ./12
Hamilton will need to reorder its priorities. In so doing we must account for all public subsidies & real costs to ensure we are fully informed. The reordering must not undermine our future, but set us on course to becoming a more sustainable, resilient & fairer city. /13
