1n The @IndianExpress has put out a piece today, quoting verbatim from a CLASSIFIED & PROPRIETARY report prepared by some colleagues 1 week back. Curiously the quoted report also conclusively proved that there WAS NO CHINESE INTRUSION. Why was this part left out?

2n Who twisted the report to present only half the picture in today’s @IndianExpress. We certainly hope that @PMOIndia & @rajnathsingh realise that the mischievous peddling of such incomplete information is being done to force them into a specific course of action. But by whom?

3n note my tweets from 24 hours ago. This was the EXACT summary of the report (which was submitted almost a week back). The report had 2 parts. 1st showing no intrusion 2nd showing a slight buildup on the Chinese side. https://twitter.com/iyervval/status/1265906678353948672?s=21 https://twitter.com/iyervval/status/1265906678353948672

4n If the IE correspondents SAW this report with their own eyes it begs the question how they missed PROPRIETARY printed at the top of each page. This constitutes a serious case of intellectual property theft by @IndianExpress, not to mention deliberate omission of relevant facts

5n On the other hand, if the correspondents did NOT SEE the report, what good faith basis did @rajkamaljha have for publishing such an inflammatory report? If not plagiarism it constitutes atrocious editorial standards.