Recent preprint reporting that 24/24 (100%) people form Singapore infected by SARS-1 in 2003 have pre-existing T-cell immunity against #SARSCoV2, but more surprisingly 9/18 (50%) with no exposure to SARS-1 also possess T-cells targeting #SARSCoV2.
(1/4)
https://tinyurl.com/yauc42as ">https://tinyurl.com/yauc42as&...
(1/4)
https://tinyurl.com/yauc42as ">https://tinyurl.com/yauc42as&...
One take home message is that infection with coronaviruses induces strong and long-lasting T-cell (cross-)immunity. T-cell immunity is likely a far more important for our immune response to #SARSCoV2 infection than antibodies, in line with other recent reports.
(2/4)
(2/4)
What remains unresolved is which virus caused T-cell immunity in the people with no prior exposure to SARS-1 in 2003. We know of seven coronaviruses infecting humans: #SARSCoV2, SARS-1, MERS and four causing & #39;common colds& #39; (OC43, HKU1, 229E and NL63).
(3/4)
(3/4)
Intriguingly, none of the known viruses in circulation in humans looks like a good candidate for the T-cell immunity to #SARSCoV2 in those with no prior exposure to SARS-1. This might suggest that other yet unknown coronaviruses could have been in circulation in humans.
(4/4)
(4/4)