(1/6) Press Sec. @kayleighmcenany highlights a voter-fraud scheme in Clark Co, NV. Commission cut a dirty deal w/Dems to mail ballots to inactive voters who don’t live at address on file. Partisan pundits attack her but are conflating 2 voting styles.

(2/6) Absentee ballots require a registered active voter to request a ballot to be mailed to them, which is different from a vote-by-mail election. We’re concerned with vote-by-mail since the chances of fraud are higher.

(3/6) When you mail inactive voters as in Clark County (greater Las Vegas) chances for fraud go way up. These are voters presumed to have moved after many failed attempts to confirm residence so they’re kept on the rolls but made inactive. (Can still go in person & vote June 9.)

(4/6) The biggest problem with all this is chain-of-custody. It’s very hard to establish great chain of custody with mail-in elections. It’s especially hard when Dems are suing to remove what little safeguard there is in the mail-in system, namely signature verification.

(5/6) That ruling could come down tomorrow & our mail-in primary would instantly lose this safeguard. Also, we don’t have voter ID, another part of the chain that could give voters more confidence our elections are fair.

(6/6) Hope this clears up some of the confusion, intentionally or innocently, sowed by some commentators in Nevada. Next we will tackle ballot harvesting.