1/ I've been overwhelmed by the response to the post about statement analysis and whether or not TRAs believe that TWAW.

I have the statement analysis knowledge, and you lovely people have the knowledge about the trans debate. So here's the deal.

2/ I'm going to post a principle of statement analysis as succinctly as I can, and you guys can play along by providing examples from the TRAs. I'll do one a day.

Today's principle is "Repetition and the need to convince."

3/ If a man tells you he is happily married, believe him.

If he says he's very happily married, ask why he's saying very.

Very, very happily married, raise an eyebrow.

Very, very, very happily married, feel free to recommend him a divorce lawyer.

4/ Repetition betrays the need to convince.

I had an aquaintance who was transitioning from male to female, and every post on Facebook was about what a beautiful woman this person was becoming. Women don't do that.

Repetition, need to convince.

5/ Even where somebody is accused of a crime, they don't feel the need to convince the investigators of anything - the truth stands on its own strength.

So, over to you, tweeps.

Are there any examples of Repetition and the need to convince in the trans debates?