1/ I& #39;ve been overwhelmed by the response to the post about statement analysis and whether or not TRAs believe that TWAW.

I have the statement analysis knowledge, and you lovely people have the knowledge about the trans debate. So here& #39;s the deal.

2/ I& #39;m going to post a principle of statement analysis as succinctly as I can, and you guys can play along by providing examples from the TRAs. I& #39;ll do one a day.

Today& #39;s principle is "Repetition and the need to convince."

3/ If a man tells you he is happily married, believe him.

If he says he& #39;s very happily married, ask why he& #39;s saying very.

Very, very happily married, raise an eyebrow.

Very, very, very happily married, feel free to recommend him a divorce lawyer.

4/ Repetition betrays the need to convince.

I had an aquaintance who was transitioning from male to female, and every post on Facebook was about what a beautiful woman this person was becoming. Women don& #39;t do that.

Repetition, need to convince.

5/ Even where somebody is accused of a crime, they don& #39;t feel the need to convince the investigators of anything - the truth stands on its own strength.

So, over to you, tweeps.

Are there any examples of Repetition and the need to convince in the trans debates?