Read on Twitter
listening the chromatica rn.. let& #39;s see what white gays are talkin bout
chromatica I: idk there& #39;s no lyrics or her voice so a good start me thinks JSJDJ
alice: simple asf. robot gaga is back. anyways.
stupid love: i don& #39;t think i need to say something about this
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="đ" title="Skull" aria-label="Emoji: Skull">
rain on me: i don& #39;t really like but ngl after more listen it became catchy asf
free woman: chile wtf. no one moved. she sounds so sleepy pls. lemme skip.
fun tonight: kinda liked this.
chromatica II: no lyrics and no voice so we& #39;re good https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="âš" title="Sparkles" aria-label="Emoji: Sparkles">
911: lemme skip chile..
plastic doll: idk why all songs sound the same.. the chorus is not that bad.
sour candy: blackpink sounds so good on this track.. it was a good song till gaga started singing. anyways.
enigma: the pre chorus is ok. ion think ill listen this again tho
replay: this is not gonna be replayed again chile
chromatica III: period
sine from above: i like the start. elton shouldn& #39;t have been on this track at all.
1000 Doves: nothing different.. skip
babylon: plsss wtf is this me!ss.. i only liked the saxophone sound.
this album was hyped tf up. just like future nostalgia. but the problem is, future nostalgia deserved it cuz it sounds so good and every track sounds different. chromatica tracks sound the same. nothing different. i expected this tho.. anyways fn stays unbothered and aoty.
