When reports talk about transmission chains and reproduction numbers, it can conjure an image of a clockwork outbreak, e.g. 3 cases infecting 3 more, who infect 3 more... The resulting image is one of a steadily growing outbreak, which may be undetected at first. 2/
To show the difference, here are some simulations of new COVID outbreaks with little variation in transmission (adapted from @C_Althaus' code here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(15)70135-0/fulltext) - each one follows similar path over time. 5/
In contrast, if transmission involves superspreading event, many outbreaks fail to spark initially, but when they do, they can grow rapidly. So what does this mean for the next phase of the epidemics in Europe, US and elsewhere? 6/
When we talk about the effects of relaxing measures, we shouldn't think of it like a clockwork process, e.g. relax measures a bit, R immediately goes up a bit; ease them a lot, R immediately goes up a lot. 7/
Instead, we should probably think of it like those early introductions, which took time to spark. Countries may relax measures & initially see little change in cases. But it doesn't necessarily mean risk isn't there - it may just be that, by chance, the spark is yet to come. 8/8
You can follow @AdamJKucharski.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: