You just know she wanted to say the t slur and settled on "you people" instead.

Her example, her reason for starting all this bullshit, was Maya Forstater. Her work contract was not renewed following her aggressive transphobia, she then went on to try to get UK laws changed so bigots would be a protected class.

Kelly says this "wasn't the best example".

When asked for other examples, she provides a google link that showed two instances of people being fired for racist comments, neither was analogous to her original claims of working class people being fired for a difference of opinions.

Additional note, the method she is using here in attempting to find evidence is biased. She has a preconceived conclusion and she is searching for evidence to support it.

She removed her video supporting trans women, because saying trans women are women "is cringe and her ideas have shifted"

The scientific, medical, and sociological consensus is that trans women are women.

But Kelly seems to have no problem disregarding medical and scientific consensus based on her feelings about the lockdown in an attempt to deal with COVID-19.

Kelly says that trans people's gender identity is a delusion.

No matter what she says, this was started about Maya's work contract not getting renewed, because Kelly sees Maya as a martyr and a hero, because Kelly is a terf.

Cw: slurs

.

.

Pretend you dont know her politics, pretend there are no dates on these tweets, and try to tell me this doesn't read exactly like anti-SJW twitter from years ago.

Kelly is a terf and a class reductionist.

This one just popped up, what can I say but yikes?

Peter platformed a terf, and when confronted with this information did nothing. These retweets are still up.

What did Peter do when confronted with the information that their tweet piggybacking off a terf came off as transphobic? They said this:

When asked directly to clarify, Peter ignored the requests. For all of their claims of trying to appeal to the working class, their intentional use of inaccessible and convoluted language sure seems to be counter intuitive to this goal.

Instead, they withdraw from the conversation and just start retweeting the things people supporting them are interpreting from their tweet.

Peter does this every time they have a take that gets backlash, they pull back and let others twist their take into something palatable.

Here is the original and final tweet side by side. The original doesn't mention doxxing, and it isnt about using punishment to achieve goals. It is an expression of concern for transphobes with no real acknowledgement of the harm these bigots cause.

Cw: slur
Also think I forgot to cw one of the screengrabs earlier, sorry about that.

.

.

Also, call me petty if you want, but Peter chooses to still pal around with known rapist MaterialistWife aka gwen_no_fear that they defended in the past.