I feel like Constitutional Originalists are lazy. Sure, sure, they know the Constitution back & forth as it is written and... that’s it. Aside from memorization, there’s no real work involved? So sometimes I wonder: Do Originalists ACTUALLY believe what they’re saying...

...or do they just not feel like doing the work involved to interpret the Constitution for our ever-changing times? Because it honestly seems more & more like the latter. It’s almost ignorant to ACTUALLY believe the framers wrote it as a finite document. But if not ignorance...

...and they realize what they’re doing is wrong, then what they’re presenting to the public is intellectually dishonest. It seems so painfully obvious to me, a regular bitch, that the Constitution is a Living document & yet you wanna tell me, there’s people who REALLY believe...

...that situations occurring NOW should have the exact same implications applied to them because of words written in this document in 1789? Get the fuck outta here. Lying, lazy, ignorant, intellectually dishonest lawyers & judges

Anyway... this thread will get buried & no one will ever see it, so here’s another pic of my tiddies, double chin & new wig