I've been debating this person and @SameerAstron about life and they keep on bringing up consciousness and not only that, but stating that consciousness is a builohical process. So o have some time to spare so oli thought I'd actually give neuroscientists to embarrass these fools https://twitter.com/cubicleman78/status/1265792390373281792
Christof kock american neuroscientist who is best known for his attempts to link consciousness with neuron bases states that in his book " the feeling of life itself" conscious is subjective experience and by definition, cannot be something provable
Christof kock american neuroscientist who is best known for his attempts to link consciousness with neuron bases states that in his book " the feeling of life itself" conscious is subjective experience and by definition, cannot be something provable
Christof kock american neuroscientist who is best known for his attempts to link consciousness with neuron bases states that in his book " the feeling of life itself" conscious is subjective experience and by definition, cannot be something provable
Christof kock american neuroscientist who is best known for his attempts to link consciousness with neuron bases states that in his book " the feeling of life itself" conscious is subjective experience and by definition, cannot be something provable
Christof kock american neuroscientist who is best known for his attempts to link consciousness with neuron bases states that in his book " the feeling of life itself" conscious is subjective experience and by definition, cannot be something provable
Some schaolrs such as Patricia and paul church land has dismissed consciousness outright as a concept. If it was real and observable, they couldnt possible do this. Daniel.dennet on the other hand explains that it does exist but its elusive. How do u explain the "redness of red"
Some schaolrs such as Patricia and paul church land has dismissed consciousness outright as a concept. If it was real and observable, they couldnt possible do this. Daniel.dennet on the other hand explains that it does exist but its elusive. How do u explain the "redness of red"
Some schaolrs such as Patricia and paul church land has dismissed consciousness outright as a concept. If it was real and observable, they couldnt possible do this. Daniel.dennet on the other hand explains that it does exist but its elusive. How do u explain the "redness of red"
Some schaolrs such as Patricia and paul church land has dismissed consciousness outright as a concept. If it was real and observable, they couldnt possible do this. Daniel.dennet on the other hand explains that it does exist but its elusive. How do u explain the "redness of red"
Some schaolrs such as Patricia and paul church land has dismissed consciousness outright as a concept. If it was real and observable, they couldnt possible do this. Daniel.dennet on the other hand explains that it does exist but its elusive. How do u explain the "redness of red"
Or the "painfulness of pain?" In fact, the author calls consciousness "the illusion we all share" it's even hard to explain consciousness as experience. I would like any of the 2 people I linked in this tweet. If consciousness is biological and is what defines what makes us
Who we are and is rhe main determinant for whether someone is "alive" as you state, then why are actual neuroscientists and philosophers who've been dealing with this subject saying we cant even begin to explain it? Now you're telling me something we cant even prove in adult
Humans is what we base whether we can validate an abortion? Michael Graziano, professor of psychology and neuroscience at princeton basically states the same in his book " rethinking conaciousness" he states that maybe consciousness is just the way the brain constructs models
Humans is what we base whether we can validate an abortion? Michael Graziano, professor of psychology and neuroscience at princeton basically states the same in his book " rethinking conaciousness" he states that maybe consciousness is just the way the brain constructs models
Humans is what we base whether we can validate an abortion? Michael Graziano, professor of psychology and neuroscience at princeton basically states the same in his book " rethinking conaciousness" he states that maybe consciousness is just the way the brain constructs models
Humans is what we base whether we can validate an abortion? Michael Graziano, professor of psychology and neuroscience at princeton basically states the same in his book " rethinking conaciousness" he states that maybe consciousness is just the way the brain constructs models
Humans is what we base whether we can validate an abortion? Michael Graziano, professor of psychology and neuroscience at princeton basically states the same in his book " rethinking conaciousness" he states that maybe consciousness is just the way the brain constructs models
Graziano hoes on to state that people describe and define consciousness is different amd it's usually seen as subjective experience. He also goes on to state that consciousness is seeing the "redness of redness" and that "seeing feels like something". He hoes on to give an
Graziano hoes on to state that people describe and define consciousness is different amd it's usually seen as subjective experience. He also goes on to state that consciousness is seeing the "redness of redness" and that "seeing feels like something". He hoes on to give an
Graziano hoes on to state that people describe and define consciousness is different amd it's usually seen as subjective experience. He also goes on to state that consciousness is seeing the "redness of redness" and that "seeing feels like something". He hoes on to give an
Graziano hoes on to state that people describe and define consciousness is different amd it's usually seen as subjective experience. He also goes on to state that consciousness is seeing the "redness of redness" and that "seeing feels like something". He hoes on to give an
Graziano hoes on to state that people describe and define consciousness is different amd it's usually seen as subjective experience. He also goes on to state that consciousness is seeing the "redness of redness" and that "seeing feels like something". He hoes on to give an
Example of how our brains compute tens of thousands of subjective experiences to make a decision based on them. He then, goes on to state that traditional scholars thought something as "amorphous and slippery" as conscious would be impossible to understand scientifically. But you
Stated that it is the scientific and biological process we use to deem if one is alive. In the last page of this thread he hoes onto state that "if" consciousness can be understood from a scientific or engineering perspective, then consciousness wouldnt just be a philosophical
Stated that it is the scientific and biological process we use to deem if one is alive. In the last page of this thread he hoes onto state that "if" consciousness can be understood from a scientific or engineering perspective, then consciousness wouldnt just be a philosophical
Stated that it is the scientific and biological process we use to deem if one is alive. In the last page of this thread he hoes onto state that "if" consciousness can be understood from a scientific or engineering perspective, then consciousness wouldnt just be a philosophical
Game for scholars anymore. I want to now ask a few questions. Do the 2 people I @ed in this tweet more knowledgable than actual neuroscientists and have solved consciousness biologically? If so, then please provide your evidence. It's in high demand. Or are you just using
That you're atheists to claim unscientific nonsense as many do, to make a philosophical argument you sadly think is biological and provable? I'd love your response. Also, I had told you id do this if you kept pushing that conscious is biological
You can follow @AbuUlaymo.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
There are a lot of misconceptions about the Turkish diaspora in Germany. Since i just finished writing an essay about this topic I thought it's time to give other people
Read more
Las mejores calculadoras online en 2020A thread http://totumat.com/2020/11/26/las-mejores-calculadoras-online-en-2020/ Cuando se estudian asignaturas que requieren de cálculos complicados, nada mejor que contar con una buena calculadora.
Read more
Mitigating #ClimateChange is as much about taking up new techs as about leaving others behindMost studies focus on #coal's global downfall but another #energy tech decline is loomingRead my new
Read more