Read on Twitter
Alright, this is about Bi/Pan Lesbians, please read before doing stupid stuff like insulting me 
Ok, so we agree that the definition of a lesbian is : "A girl attracted to girls" right ?
But, if a Non-Binary person identify as a lesbian, as long as they're not a man-
1/5
Ok, so we agree that the definition of a lesbian is : "A girl attracted to girls" right ?
But, if a Non-Binary person identify as a lesbian, as long as they're not a man-
1/5
-it's fine, right ? You are not gonna beat the shit out of them, just because they doesn't feat perfectly at the definition, right ?
So, next exemple, if a lesbian is asexual, she/they are not attracted sexually by women, right ? Is she/they are less a lesbian in there ?
2/5
So, next exemple, if a lesbian is asexual, she/they are not attracted sexually by women, right ? Is she/they are less a lesbian in there ?
2/5
Or is it fine, because sexual attraction and romantic attraction, are clearly not the same ? Same thing if she/they are aromantic, right ?
In all the cases, no one (except transphobes and acephobes) will disagree that they are lesbians.
3/5
In all the cases, no one (except transphobes and acephobes) will disagree that they are lesbians.
3/5
So, why are you so triggered by bi/pan lesbians ? Juste because their sexual/romantic attraction doesn't feat perfectly at the definition, does not mean that they're less valid, or that you have the right to tell them that they are not what they say.
4/5
4/5
That they are confused, that they feat with another identity, that they doesn't exist.
It's extremely hypocritical from the LGBT+ community to reject and invisible some of us because of their identity.
Please, don't do that.
5/5
It's extremely hypocritical from the LGBT+ community to reject and invisible some of us because of their identity.
Please, don't do that.
5/5
Probably gonna get a lot of hate because of that, but fuck it, I needed to say that 
