Read on Twitter
This is a pretty disappointing article. I previously retweeted it before reading it - purely because I loved the cover - but after reading it, itâs clear that this article is just as bad as the drivel that the Daily Mail and similar publications publish https://twitter.com/Tatlermagazine/status/1265331997402071040">https://twitter.com/Tatlermag...
It started off okay for the first few paragraphs, and then mention of these âa close friend of the Royalsâ sources started popping up and it just went downhill
This article treats a slew of untrue rumours and hearsay as fact with alarming confidence. Itâs like the author, a gossip monger more than a journalist, hasnât even bothered to fact check
Further, itâs so clear to anyone with deductive reasoning skills that every single comment from a âsource close to the coupleâ has been concocted out of thin air - as they usually are in these sort of articles - plucked from the unimaginative head of the author themselves
Further, the way this author speaks of Carole and the sisters just digs up long put to bed assumptions about them being social climbers. I think everyone had come to see that they arenât, so I really donât understand why this âjournoâ had to bring it back up?
Basically, donât believe a single word of this drivel. Tatler may seem like a more reputable source of information, but theyâre just a gossip rag for people who donât want to be seen buying a gossip magazine
Rest assured that the only reason this has been written is because itâs a slow news day for Tatler and other tabloid mags. Itâs the same reason why weâre suddenly seeing bad press about the DoC from the Daily Mail
Instead of these tabs reporting on something else, theyâre now just microwaving stale old news to stay relevant. Once again; donât be so quick to believe the things they publish. Their aim isnât to provide factual information, but to elicit shock and controversy
