Read on Twitter
Jia’s latest addendum moves her firmly from naive to complicit in my mind
Drop “Bush-era security apparatus” & use the conflict of the state vs immigrants to obscure class conflict & abuse
Then link to a thread focused almost exclusively on the technical definition of smuggling
Drop “Bush-era security apparatus” & use the conflict of the state vs immigrants to obscure class conflict & abuse
Then link to a thread focused almost exclusively on the technical definition of smuggling
Is there something proving the abuse/usury was found to be untrue? If it exists, why not link to it instead of a random thread by an injury & malpractice lawyer? A lawyer who btw flipped a couple of days later & admitted that he can’t know what’s true and what’s not.
There’s a whole community of Filipinos doing immigration & labor advocacy. They’re talking, about this case but also about what ppl are facing right now from similar businesses, but you wouldn’t know that from Jia’s coverage.
All anyone has asked Jia to recognize is
1. her parents were part of an industry known to harm immigrants for profit
2. we can’t take her post at face value b/c it left out the testimony of the ppl most affected
3. there are so many unknowns & she’s not an appropriate arbiter
1. her parents were part of an industry known to harm immigrants for profit
2. we can’t take her post at face value b/c it left out the testimony of the ppl most affected
3. there are so many unknowns & she’s not an appropriate arbiter
Jia saying she wants to report on her parents’ business & interview the nurses/teachers makes my skin crawl.
It’s not just that she’s being like “hey editors hit me up!!” but also that we know she has firmly picked a side. Could she truly report fairly or interview with grace?
It’s not just that she’s being like “hey editors hit me up!!” but also that we know she has firmly picked a side. Could she truly report fairly or interview with grace?
