The point about removing Trump& #39;s tweets is interesting, b/c it& #39;d likely be difficult.

As President, Trump has broken Twitter& #39;s TOS before, like in 2017 when he said N.Korea "won& #39;t be around much longer" (threats of violence). In that instance, Twitter didn& #39;t enforce their policy https://twitter.com/AlexMillerNews/status/1265273763194638336">https://twitter.com/AlexMille...

After being accused of not enforcing their policies, Twitter last year changed their rules on what constituted speech from public figures/when it& #39;s censored. Now, Twitter says violating tweets can stay up if they& #39;re from gov. officials and if they& #39;re in public& #39;s interest to see.

This kind of "public interest" reasoning makes sense in order to create an official record of what happened. But it does give Twitter a lot of leeway in deciding:

1) when they& #39;ll actually step in to enforce their policy
2) what content is and isn& #39;t in the public interest

https://twitter.com/donie/status/1265280488312315905

Update">https://twitter.com/donie/sta... per this thread: Twitter has said that& #39;s it& #39;s not going to take down the Tweets.