i was fighting with a "bi lesbian" and these are the ss and my intake on what their "proof" of bi lesbians existing is https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">
i was fighting with a "bi lesbian" and these are the ss and my intake on what their "proof" of bi lesbians existing is https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable=https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">" title="i was fighting with a "bi lesbian" and these are the ss and my intake on what their "proof" of bi lesbians existing is https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="😁" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Grinning face with smiling eyes">" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
here are the dms from start to finish!!!
this was their only source of evidence <33
heres my intake!!!
ps ++ their pronouns are they/them so pls respect that if ur reading this and want to give your own intake <33
they really never had a point to begin with because obviously bi lesbians are non existent, but i tired to understand where they were coming from and i still dont understand because the evidence they gave me was just further proving that bi lesbians arent a thing +++
++ they went more off history than now, which was their first wrong move-- they were trying to prove that lesbian historically included bi/pansexuals in their sexuality and called them lesbians. their proof of that was doctors prescribing them as lesbians ++
this was also wrong because it never said that in the paragraph-- but i can go on and on about how they are wrong and why bi lesbians arent a thing but instead im just gonna give my actual intake like i said i would lol you can go over that urself :) ++
so my overall intake is.... they proved me right in all the evidence listed and didnt do anything to "educate" me on "bi-lesbians" they just made my point more visible. and i dont have a grudge over them i just think they need to think more about other people rather than ++
themselves because they dont understand that identifying as a "bi-lesbain" can damage the meaning of both lesbian and bi/pan sexualities. they dont understand that people identify as these sexualities because they feel comfortable with their meaning :( i hope they can educate ++
++ themselves without hurting any other people
end of thread!!!
You can follow @jhscIit.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: