Presidential election margin by year:
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
WI -- R+0.77%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
WI -- D+6.93%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
WI -- D+13.91
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
WI -- D+0.38%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
WI -- D+0.22%
Saying WI is a battleground, but MN is completely safe is silly.
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
WI -- R+0.77%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
WI -- D+6.93%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
WI -- D+13.91
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
WI -- D+0.38%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
WI -- D+0.22%
Saying WI is a battleground, but MN is completely safe is silly.
Here are the numbers comparing MN to MI:
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
MI -- R+0.23%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
MI -- D+9.50%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
MI -- D+16.44%
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
MI -- D+3.42%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
MI -- D+5.13%
MN is as hard, if not harder, for a Democrat to win as MI.
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
MI -- R+0.23%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
MI -- D+9.50%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
MI -- D+16.44%
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
MI -- D+3.42%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
MI -- D+5.13%
MN is as hard, if not harder, for a Democrat to win as MI.
Here are the numbers comparing MN to PA:
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
PA -- R+0.72%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
PA -- D+5.38%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
PA -- D+10.32%
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
PA -- D+2.50%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
PA -- D+4.17%
Given Biden& #39;s PA ties, PA may be bluer than MN in 2020.
2016:
MN -- D+1.52%
PA -- R+0.72%
2012:
MN -- D+7.69%
PA -- D+5.38%
2008:
MN -- D+10.24%
PA -- D+10.32%
2004:
MN -- D+3.48%
PA -- D+2.50%
2000:
MN -- D+2.41%
PA -- D+4.17%
Given Biden& #39;s PA ties, PA may be bluer than MN in 2020.
This thread is specifically for @christos_ioa because he resurfaced today
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="đź‘€" title="Eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Eyes">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="đź‘€" title="Eyes" aria-label="Emoji: Eyes"> https://twitter.com/christos_ioa/status/1237809461709897734?s=20">https://twitter.com/christos_...