[THREAD]
1/ "No native writing system was known among North American Indians at the time of first European contact... a number of writing systems for... Indian languages were developed as a result of the stimulus from European writing."
https://www.britannica.com/topic/North-American-Indian-languages">https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nor...
1/ "No native writing system was known among North American Indians at the time of first European contact... a number of writing systems for... Indian languages were developed as a result of the stimulus from European writing."
https://www.britannica.com/topic/North-American-Indian-languages">https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nor...
2/ His second point doesn& #39;t explain why the wheel wasn& #39;t developed in those parts of North America which *weren& #39;t* covered by snow most of the year — in other words, most of North America.
3/ In a later tweet, after helpfully advising me to “read a few books,” he argued that indigenous pictographic drawings on tree bark were written language.
“It depends on how you define writing,” he adds. Personally, I define writing as actual, you know, writing.
“It depends on how you define writing,” he adds. Personally, I define writing as actual, you know, writing.
4/ Oh, and he& #39;s an anthropologist. Surprising, I know.
Quick guide to anthropology:
Europeans bad. Most other cultures good — especially those lacking civilizational impulses in areas like science, technology, and, uhm, writing.
Quick guide to anthropology:
Europeans bad. Most other cultures good — especially those lacking civilizational impulses in areas like science, technology, and, uhm, writing.
There are 133 Democrats for each Republican among US anthropology faculty, so it& #39;s not like you can accuse them any ideological bias.