

Weighting:
Film/Landing Spot/Profile 80/10/10
Ranks:
1. Lamb
2. Reagor
3. Jeudy
4. Jefferson
5. Ruggs
6. Edwards
7. Mims
8. Aiyuk
9. Higgins
10. Pittman
Process Review Thread

I'm heavy on the tape. After creating a grading system last season, I measured my film grades as the most valuable analytic for 2019's rookie WR class in terms of correlation to fantasy PPG. (Tiny irrelevant sample size, but who cares, call it 1 for 1) https://twitter.com/JetPackGalileo/status/1261373047409242112
There is a methodology to this process, and it's not charting. I'm converting my art into science. Measuring something that was previously unmeasured, so that I can test the value.
The value is great. #GalileoGameScope
The value is great. #GalileoGameScope
Now, the theory around the Rocket Score is that we can slide the values around. Over time I expect to find the right balance with more data.
My bias says 80/10/10 is a decent starting point.
My bias says 80/10/10 is a decent starting point.
My College Resume Profile work was built in the spring.
Here's an article on some of the process built into it, featuring Team Adjusted Dominator, Conference Adjusted Productivity, and my Combine Score, etc.
https://www.ffastronauts.com/post/the-college-productivity-score-rocket-science
Here's an article on some of the process built into it, featuring Team Adjusted Dominator, Conference Adjusted Productivity, and my Combine Score, etc.
https://www.ffastronauts.com/post/the-college-productivity-score-rocket-science
Grading the Landing Spots objectively is a growing process.
I built Volume Amplified Passer Rating (VAPR) to evaluate QBs and Offenses that can support multiple fantasy relevant WRs. A 5.0 scale is applied to VAPR to get it in this model. https://twitter.com/JetPackGalileo/status/1264207903403257856
I built Volume Amplified Passer Rating (VAPR) to evaluate QBs and Offenses that can support multiple fantasy relevant WRs. A 5.0 scale is applied to VAPR to get it in this model. https://twitter.com/JetPackGalileo/status/1264207903403257856
VAPR fills out the QB/Offense component.
Opportunity is measured relative to how many other WRs in the offense owned a target share higher than 20%. If depth chart is wide open: 5.0. If only one: 4.5.
Below are the highest rated Landing Spots.
Opportunity is measured relative to how many other WRs in the offense owned a target share higher than 20%. If depth chart is wide open: 5.0. If only one: 4.5.
Below are the highest rated Landing Spots.
CeeDee stays atop class with such a high Film Grade.
2-4 can all shift around very easily, it's mostly just about weighting, but I got Reagor at 2.
Ruggs and Edwards pinned close together is fun.
Higgins landing spot has a rough score, but grading Burrow is just a guess.
2-4 can all shift around very easily, it's mostly just about weighting, but I got Reagor at 2.
Ruggs and Edwards pinned close together is fun.
Higgins landing spot has a rough score, but grading Burrow is just a guess.
I'll be writing an article to go more in depth, but would love to hear feedback and bounce ideas around for adjusting/re-organizing.