https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🚀" title="Rocket" aria-label="Emoji: Rocket">2020 Rookie WR Rocket Scoreshttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🚀" title="Rocket" aria-label="Emoji: Rocket">

Weighting:
Film/Landing Spot/Profile 80/10/10

Ranks:
1. Lamb
2. Reagor
3. Jeudy
4. Jefferson
5. Ruggs
6. Edwards
7. Mims
8. Aiyuk
9. Higgins
10. Pittman

Process Review Thread https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="⬇️" title="Downwards arrow" aria-label="Emoji: Downwards arrow">

I& #39;m heavy on the tape. After creating a grading system last season, I measured my film grades as the most valuable analytic for 2019& #39;s rookie WR class in terms of correlation to fantasy PPG. (Tiny irrelevant sample size, but who cares, call it 1 for 1) https://twitter.com/JetPackGalileo/status/1261373047409242112">https://twitter.com/JetPackGa...

There is a methodology to this process, and it& #39;s not charting. I& #39;m converting my art into science. Measuring something that was previously unmeasured, so that I can test the value.

The value is great. #GalileoGameScope

Now, the theory around the Rocket Score is that we can slide the values around. Over time I expect to find the right balance with more data.

My bias says 80/10/10 is a decent starting point.

My College Resume Profile work was built in the spring.

Here& #39;s an article on some of the process built into it, featuring Team Adjusted Dominator, Conference Adjusted Productivity, and my Combine Score, etc.

https://www.ffastronauts.com/post/the-college-productivity-score-rocket-science">https://www.ffastronauts.com/post/the-...

Grading the Landing Spots objectively is a growing process.

I built Volume Amplified Passer Rating (VAPR) to evaluate QBs and Offenses that can support multiple fantasy relevant WRs. A 5.0 scale is applied to VAPR to get it in this model. https://twitter.com/JetPackGalileo/status/1264207903403257856">https://twitter.com/JetPackGa...

VAPR fills out the QB/Offense component.

Opportunity is measured relative to how many other WRs in the offense owned a target share higher than 20%. If depth chart is wide open: 5.0. If only one: 4.5.

Below are the highest rated Landing Spots.

CeeDee stays atop class with such a high Film Grade.

2-4 can all shift around very easily, it& #39;s mostly just about weighting, but I got Reagor at 2.

Ruggs and Edwards pinned close together is fun.

Higgins landing spot has a rough score, but grading Burrow is just a guess.

I& #39;ll be writing an article to go more in depth, but would love to hear feedback and bounce ideas around for adjusting/re-organizing.