Latest issue of IS newsletter "al-Naba" includes the second installment in series of articles narrating how the group withstood "the infidels& #39; war on the Islamic State."

The title this time: "Breaking the Siege on the Islamic State of Iraq." https://jihadology.net/2020/05/21/new-issue-of-the-islamic-states-newsletter-al-naba-235/

1/4">https://jihadology.net/2020/05/2...

This edition highlights the importance of Syria& #39;s war in reviving IS (then ISI) in Iraq after 2010, as it foiled a "Crusader" plot to suppress the group made of two parts:

1. Continuing pressure by ISI& #39;s enemies inside Iraq.

2. A "siege" on IS by neighboring countries.

2/4

In IS& #39;s telling, pressure on it inside Iraq relaxed when Iraq& #39;s factions turned on each other.

Syria& #39;s war, meanwhile, broke the "siege" – it was a "window from which the jihad in Iraq could breathe," as Syria& #39;s state contracted and IS reactivated networks (translation https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇🏻" title="Down pointing backhand index (light skin tone)" aria-label="Emoji: Down pointing backhand index (light skin tone)">).

3/4

This is why I argued for @CrisisGroup that 2014 is unlikely to repeat – things had gone wrong inside *and* outside Iraq in ways that supercharged IS: https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/iraq/when-measuring-isiss-resurgence-use-right-standard

IS">https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-ea... may be getting worse in Iraq – but we need to measure that by a more real standard, not 2013-14.

4/4