Correspondence justifying ICMR's guideline for using #HCQ for prophylaxis in healthcare workers, in @TheLancet by AIIMS medicine department. My first thought: "They're the experts, so there must be some good science behind it!" To convince myself, I dig a little deeper
1/n
Counter-evidence: study published in @TheLancet two days back. 671 hospital, 6 continents. 81k control group. 3k received HCQ, 6k HCQ + Azithro. Controlled for comorbidities. HCQ and HCQ + Azithro independently associated w/ inc risk of mortality and ventricular arrhythmia.
3/n
Three references used to justify the use of HCQ. Even if we ignore the fact that none of them were for pre-exposure prophylaxis, all three suffer major major methodological flaws. There is increasing evidence that HCQ does more harm than good when used for treatment.
6/n
Conclusion: I still can't wrap my head around why HCQ prophylaxis is recommended. But, I'm just a student. The experts at my institute say otherwise
So, when not long from now I'll have COVID-19 duties, will I be taking HCQ? I don't know. I hope I'm less confused then.
8/n
End.
You can follow @Mudit_Agrwal.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: