Read on Twitter
Who had the closest Senate vote confirmations?
SESSIONS’ Senate vote?
52-47
[RR] Senate vote?
94-6
BARR Senate vote?
54-45
Sessions departure. Law.
Barr to RR:
“Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?”
@realDonaldTrump @jeffsessions
SESSIONS’ Senate vote?
52-47
[RR] Senate vote?
94-6
BARR Senate vote?
54-45
Sessions departure. Law.
Barr to RR:
“Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?”
@realDonaldTrump @jeffsessions
Sometimes you need to 'take one for the team publicly' before you are vindicated as a hero.
Q
Q
Rogers departure. Intel.
Sessions departure. Law.
Kelly departure. Warfare/MIL
Mattis departure. Warfare/MIL
Notice a pattern?
Q
#QAnon
Sessions departure. Law.
Kelly departure. Warfare/MIL
Mattis departure. Warfare/MIL
Notice a pattern?
Q
#QAnon
What if there's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
ONE FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS?
NOT LONG NOW.
Q
ONE FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS?
NOT LONG NOW.
Q
HUBER will bring SEVERE PAIN TO DC.
SESSIONS' forced release of name [HUBER] to House created another variable.
Use Logic.
SESSIONS' forced release of name [HUBER] to House created another variable.
Use Logic.
To all those who doubted SESSIONS & HUBER you WILL ALL PAY THE PRICE VERY SOON.
Q
Q
Thank you for your service to our Country, Mr. Jeff Sessions!
Your sacrifices will never be forgotten.
Q+
Your sacrifices will never be forgotten.
Q+
But… POTUS is attacking SESSIONS via TWITTER so therefore he is not working on behalf of the people’s interest (or POTUS’) [D’s/LEFT LOVE/TRUST SESSIONS!]
But… interestingly, if nothing is being done behind the scenes, why are so many FBI & DOJ senior officials being FIRED and/or REMOVED from their respective positions of power? Who is AG? Who must sign off on each removal? DOJ in charge of FBI?
The "Experts"
But… SESSIONS should appoint a 2nd SC in DC aka THE CORRUPT SWAMP
But… SESSIONS should appoint a 2nd SC in DC aka THE CORRUPT SWAMP [team of less than 20 typically] & wait 2-4 years [take a gamble]
But… SESSIONS should appoint a 2nd SC in DC aka THE CORRUPT SWAMP
But… SESSIONS should appoint a 2nd SC in DC aka THE CORRUPT SWAMP [team of less than 20 typically] & wait 2-4 years [take a gamble]
But… SESSIONS should appoint a 2nd SC in DC aka THE CORRUPT SWAMP because unlike the CLINTON EMAIL CORRUPT CASE [as demonstrated by the FBI/DOJ people FIRED/REMOVED] this will be conducted faithfully and honestly [like MUELLER]
But… HUBER has not ‘directly’ interviewed several witnesses therefore the appointment of HUBER by SESSIONS [and therefore the IG] is not genuine
But… SESSIONS & HUBER are following standard DOJ open/ongoing investigation policy by not discussing [making public] so therefore nothing must be happening [FIRE SESSIONS!]
But… HUBER [ability to prosecute + empanel a grand jury outside of DC [90%+ voted HRC (2016)], who already began the investigation(s) late last year w/ assigned team of 470 investigators (attorneys) + IG + legal jurisdiction across all 50 states, is not a ‘special counsel’ so
therefore nothing is being done.
But… POTUS is attacking SESSIONS via TWITTER so therefore he is not working on behalf of the people’s interest (or POTUS’) [D’s/LEFT LOVE/TRUST SESSIONS!]
But… POTUS is attacking SESSIONS via TWITTER so therefore he is not working on behalf of the people’s interest (or POTUS’) [D’s/LEFT LOVE/TRUST SESSIONS!]
But… interestingly, if nothing is being done behind the scenes, why are human trafficking arrests SURGING?
Nothing to See Here.
Q
Nothing to See Here.
Q
SESSIONS and FLYNN [targeted] for [immediate] removal/recusal?
SESSIONS Senate CONF vote?
[RR] Senate CONF vote?
Reconcile.
SESSIONS Senate CONF vote?
[RR] Senate CONF vote?
Reconcile.
IF SESSIONS WASN'T A THREAT WHY WAS HE THE PRIMARY TARGET?
WHY WAS IT CRITICAL TO MOVE [RR] INTO DOJ ACTING AG RE: APPOINTMENT OF MUELLER / DIR SC OVERSIGHT [AUTH]?
WHY WAS IT CRITICAL TO MOVE [RR] INTO DOJ ACTING AG RE: APPOINTMENT OF MUELLER / DIR SC OVERSIGHT [AUTH]?
IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR ENEMY IS PLANNING HOW DO YOU PREPARE STRATEGICALLY?
THINK TODAY.
LEFT SUPPORTING SESSIONS?
LEFT DEFENDING SESSIONS?
STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?
THINK TODAY.
LEFT SUPPORTING SESSIONS?
LEFT DEFENDING SESSIONS?
STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?
With PANIC comes MISTAKES.
With PANIC comes BETRAYAL.
With PANIC comes TESTIMONY.
With PANIC comes ………….
These people are STUPID.
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
+
HOOAH!
Q
With PANIC comes BETRAYAL.
With PANIC comes TESTIMONY.
With PANIC comes ………….
These people are STUPID.
FISA GOES BOTH WAYS.
+
HOOAH!
Q
Clickbait & opinions vs logical thinking.
Direct communication necessary.
Trust yourself.
Think for yourself.
WWG1WGA!
Q
Direct communication necessary.
Trust yourself.
Think for yourself.
WWG1WGA!
Q
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if
recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q
Enjoy the show.
Q
What would be the purpose of creating confusion?
What was Sessions' Senate confirmation vote?
What was RR's Senate confirmation vote?
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
What was Sessions' Senate confirmation vote?
What was RR's Senate confirmation vote?
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.
