But "freedom" has an uncontested core, @GeorgeLakoff explains. It's metaphorically grounded in our physical experience of bodily movement: 3/14
And that translates into a common metaphorical understanding of free movement—as in "the pursuit of happiness": 4/14
The traditional American understanding of freedom is progressive, @GeorgeLakoff argues: 5/14
Much of what @GeorgeLakoff describes might not register as "freedom," partly because progressives haven't used the term robustly. But if freedom is about being able to realize your dreams, we certainly *should* be using it much more: 6/14
"Progressive freedom is dynamic freedom," @GeorgeLakoff writes: 7/14
While the opposite is true of conservatives: 8/14
Underlying their differences are competing worldviews, rooted in parenting styles, which @GeorgeLakoff first explored in *Moral Politics*: 9/14 https://bookshop.org/a/2464/9780226411293
The progressive "nurturant parent" style is actually *better* at producing the kind of autonomous moral agents that the conservative "strict father" style is *supposed* to produce: 10/
. @GeorgeLakoff discusses threats to freedom in 3 forms that I discuss (harm, coercion, or limitations on property), each *also* a contested concept, which leads to the role of *security* (as in "securing liberty"): 11/14
And "securing liberty" is central to the Anglo-American idea of freedom: 12/14
Which is why the threats @Anandwrites cited are *threats to our freedom*: 13/14
You can follow @PaulHRosenberg.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: