I can substantiate almost everything I say. Including the seemingly provocative things. However, what I generally find is that people are sensitive to tone, and have less nuanced definitions of words and concepts than I do, which commonly leads to misunderstandings.

Take the word sexism for instance.

Brainlet take: discrimination against women based on hatred.

Nuance: you would expect a man to provide & protect for a woman, simply because he is a man and for no other reason, therefore your expectation's based on gender and as such, sexist.

Gender roles are sexist. But they are also practical, and complement the psychology of each sex's needs. Women are smaller, more neurotic and less muscular than men, therefore less able to defend themselves. This is why they empathise safety and value protectiveness in a man.

Framing is very important. When a man limits his woman's freedom to ensure mutual prosperity, and she is capable of seeing why he is doing that & appreciating it, she views him as protective, but when she doesn't understand or appreciate why, she calls it possessiveness or abuse.

Women oft don't understand where a man is coming from in why he commands what he does. Especially if she's of lower intelligence, or wasn't a daddy's girl raised by a solid man who educated her in the ways of men. For such women, trusting without understanding is a leap of faith.

The truly lost women don't even believe in natural law (male authority) and view patriarchy as inherently oppressive.

They have no idea WHY it is better for men to lead and they don't ASK WHY, they simply reject the notion out of a childish sentiment it is unfair.

Yet I guarantee you if you take 1000 women, get them to work for a female led company for a year, then a male led company for a year, then ask them where they would prefer to work, guess who the vast majority would rather work for?

The male led company.

Why do women prefer to work for men over women? Because when women are forced to deal with other women, especially women who are not family and have power over them, they quickly find they are less fair, more unreasonable, crueller, less reliable and more blame shifting than men.

So if a woman is on the receiving end of female leadership, and she sees how bad it is versus her experience with male leadership, which is no doubt imperfect yet superior, why would she think its a good idea for her to be in charge or even equal in matters of romance?

Because women, in their conceit and lack of self-awareness tend to tell themselves that whilst, yes, other women can be shitty & yes, certain findings do hold across women as a whole, they themselves are not like that. They are different. They won't do those things.

But they do.

Inferior reasoning ability, increased emotionality ane a general aversion to responsibility taking.

Yet your egoistic sensibility demands parity with someone you hold to a higher standard than yourself.

"We are equals in a partnership"

No you're not, he's better than you.

If he wasn't better than you, you wouldn't have even find him attractive.

He has to prove his value, unlike you. How's that for sexism?

Reality is sexist. Men bear a disproportionate burden. It's not fair, but it's what works. Sexism is normal, and here to stay.

So get a clue.

I'm speaking nonsense, yes?

How many times have you heard a woman claim she'd rather stay on her own than settle?

What's settling?

Being with a man she doesn't view as superior to her, that she egotistically tells herself is an equal partner.

Men settle all the time, BTW.

Brainlet take: sexism is hateful discrimination against women.

No its not, its far more than that. It goes deeper than that. It's richer than that. It's the recognition of differences in ability between the sexes, and apportioning responsibility based on their strengths.

Men are disproportionately burdened, because they are better equipped to handle greater struggle. This is why they are above women. It isn't hateful, its reality, and reality is sexist, because it discriminates by ability and doesn't care how you feel.

Equality is a false God, impractical & unworkable.

But for arguments sake, true equality would see parity in responsibility, duty and blame, not just rights and privileges, and women have never been able to step up to that plate.

We are a sexist species. It is functional. End.

Remember this thread next time I say something you find distasteful or mad, because there's a good chance you don't understand it to the extent that I do, and unlike this time, where I have written an entire thread on a point of common misunderstanding

I simply will not explain.

I don't explain because I can't

I don't explain because if I did, it'd be the only thing I did

How long has this one thread taken me to write out?

I've got one life bro, and I can't spend it all clearing up misunderstandings