3
The Lancet did not do a clinical trial. They scoured the world looking for data to support their bias against #HCQ.

HCQ is proven already to be less toxic than Chloroquine.

So Lancet added people given Chloroquine to their HCQ group. Lumped together. Why? To bias the data.
4
The Lancet control group were those given no medication.

That was not a legit control group.

They failed to control for degree of respiratory distress.

The sickest people were in the HCQ &Chloroquine group.

The healthiest people were not desperate enough to take medication.
5
Lancet cherry picker the data to stack those w/ the worst & most co-morbidities (diabetes, heart disease, obesity) to be preferentially in the HCQ & Chloroquine group. Again, the no medication control group had less if not any co-morbidity.

Does this sound like good science?
6
Lancet excluded Zinc.

Hydroxychloroquine is an ionophore which means it provides a pathway for molecules into & out of cells. The Zinc sulfate is what interferes with COVID19 from hijacking the cell machinery. But it can't penetrate the cell walls well. HCQ let's Zn in.
7
Remember the W House reporters trying to embarrass Trump w/ the U. Virginia study of Veteran Admin Covid data using HCQ?

Their control group was not given placebo. Many on the control received Azithromycin (Zpack)!

ZPack interferes w/ virus replication & is anti-inflammatory
8
Bottom line is that #Lancet is no longer science

This is FRAUD SCIENCE aimed at pushing propaganda against President Trump. The media, even Fox News, is either happy to run w/ it or too scientifically illiterate to analyze it critically.
@ScottAdamsSays
@RudyGiuliani
#HCQ
You can follow @deanbc1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: