after interacting with many casual leftists, it has become extremely easy to tell the difference between secular talk lefties and majority report lefties, and as I find myself further in the latter camp, I find the former increasingly difficult to engage with

like dont get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy kyle and his content. but Kyle's show strikes me as more "teaching you the leftist perspective" and MR more as "let's think critically and, in doing so, account for the context that is the society we live in". both are useful

and both are extremely entertaining. but secular talk lefties seem armed primarily with strong ideals and many (factual) talking points to defend specifically those ideals. MR lefties seem to take away a greater sense historical context and nuance, which enhances their ability-

-to debate in favor of a leftist agenda within the context not of how things SHOULD be, but how they are.